Remove compromised GH action

[alexeyr-ci2]

Pull Request checklist

• [ ] Add/update test to cover these changes
• [ ] Update documentation
• [ ] Update CHANGELOG file

---

This change is 

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the automated process to more accurately detect file changes between commits, streamlining subsequent tasks and improving overall reliability.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The GitHub Actions workflow has been updated to replace the previous tj-actions/changed-files@v44 action with a custom shell script. The new script leverages git diff to compare commits and determine if specified files have changed. Based on this check, it sets an ANY_CHANGED variable that will control subsequent workflow steps.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
.github/workflows/examples.yml	Replaced the tj-actions/changed-files action with a custom shell script using git diff to determine file changes between two commits.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant C as Commit Trigger
    participant W as GitHub Workflow
    participant S as Shell Script
    participant G as Git Diff

    C->>W: Push new commit
    W->>S: Invoke custom shell script
    S->>G: Run git diff between commits
    G-->>S: Return diff results
    S->>W: Set and output ANY_CHANGED (true/false)
    W->>Next: Execute conditional workflow steps based on ANY_CHANGED

Loading

Possibly related PRs

• Fix problems with GitHub actions #1691: Adjustments in the GitHub Actions workflow logic for detecting file changes, similar to modifications in this PR.

Suggested reviewers

• Judahmeek

Poem

Hopping through branches of code, I hop with glee,
Diffing each change with a twitchy, keen eye.
Git commands sing a merry little tune,
Setting flags for the steps that follow soon.
In this digital garden, I cheer and leap—
A rabbit’s delight in code so deep! 🐇

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)

• We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
  - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.github/workflows/examples.yml (1)

24-36: Replace the compromised action with a custom diff check
The new shell script correctly uses git diff to detect changes across the specified paths and sets the ANY_CHANGED flag accordingly. To improve robustness, consider adding error handling (for example, a set -e at the start of the script) to ensure that any errors in the diff command cause an immediate failure rather than proceeding with possibly invalid output.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a877c76 and 303d237.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/examples.yml (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)

• GitHub Check: dummy-app-integration-tests (oldest)
• GitHub Check: dummy-app-integration-tests (newest)
• GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (oldest)
• GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (newest)
• GitHub Check: build