Skip to content

npm update#322

Merged
scottanderson merged 1 commit intomainlinefrom
update
Feb 19, 2026
Merged

npm update#322
scottanderson merged 1 commit intomainlinefrom
update

Conversation

@scottanderson
Copy link
Owner

@scottanderson scottanderson commented Feb 19, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated development dependencies to latest compatible versions.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 19, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Three devDependency versions updated in package.json: @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (^8.48.1 → ^8.56.0), globals (^16.5.0 → ^17.3.0), and webpack-dev-server (^5.2.2 → ^5.2.3). No functional code changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Dependency Version Bumps
package.json
Updated three devDependencies: @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin to ^8.56.0, globals to ^17.3.0, and webpack-dev-server to ^5.2.3.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • npm update #263: Overlaps on the same devDependencies updates (@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin and webpack-dev-server).
  • Update dependencies #306: Modifies the same set of devDependencies (@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin, globals, webpack-dev-server) in package.json.

Poem

🐰 Hops and cheers for updates so fine,
Dependencies bumped, all in a line,
Globals, TypeScript, webpack so keen,
Fresh versions dance where code convenes!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'npm update' is vague and generic; it doesn't convey specific information about which dependencies were updated or why. Consider a more descriptive title like 'Update TypeScript ESLint, globals, and webpack-dev-server dependencies' to clarify the specific packages being updated.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch update

Tip

Issue Planner is now in beta. Read the docs and try it out! Share your feedback on Discord.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@scottanderson scottanderson merged commit 8e3e73a into mainline Feb 19, 2026
4 checks passed
@scottanderson scottanderson deleted the update branch February 19, 2026 03:18
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Mar 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant