-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 695
Basic functionalities for weighted projective {curves, points, spaces} #41170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit 8c4f225; changes) is ready! 🎉 |
vincentmacri
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good overall, just a bunch of nitpicks.
Tagging @GiacomoPope @grhkm21 who were involved in the previous PR.
src/sage/schemes/weighted_projective/weighted_projective_homset.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/sage/schemes/weighted_projective/weighted_projective_space.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/sage/schemes/weighted_projective/weighted_projective_space.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| sage: WP.change_ring(GF(5)) | ||
| Weighted Projective Space of dimension 2 with weights (1, 3, 1) over Finite Field of size 5 | ||
| """ | ||
| if isinstance(R, Map): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be nice to include an example of this in the docstring.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
actually I find this mathematically questionable. Map of rings induce map of their scheme in opposite direction, right.
src/sage/schemes/weighted_projective/weighted_projective_space.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Vincent Macri <[email protected]>
|
Someone else may want to double check the equality comparison logic in case of rings with zero divisor (I haven't). |
Picking up #40070
as far as I can tell the fedora:42 failure is irrelevant.
📝 Checklist
⌛ Dependencies