-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.8k
Intrinsic overflow checks perf trial #146288
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Some changes occurred to the CTFE / Miri interpreter cc @rust-lang/miri Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt This PR changes rustc_public cc @oli-obk, @celinval, @ouz-a Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_cranelift cc @bjorn3 Some changes occurred to constck cc @fee1-dead The Miri subtree was changed cc @rust-lang/miri Some changes occurred to the intrinsics. Make sure the CTFE / Miri interpreter cc @rust-lang/miri, @RalfJung, @oli-obk, @lcnr Some changes occurred to the CTFE machinery Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy cc @rust-lang/clippy This PR changes MIR cc @oli-obk, @RalfJung, @JakobDegen, @vakaras |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
tests will fail, but this is meant for checking how it affects compile times, which shouldn't be impacted by the broken logic
3448d96
to
0cae867
Compare
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
Based on #128666
This PR exists to test the perf effects of adding a new intrinsic, like
ub_checks
, for overflow checks. Tests are expected to fail.