-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
Supress swapping lhs and rhs in equality suggestion in extern macro #144266
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
xizheyin
wants to merge
1
commit into
rust-lang:master
Choose a base branch
from
xizheyin:139050
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+47
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -3533,6 +3533,12 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { | |
.must_apply_modulo_regions() | ||
{ | ||
let sm = self.tcx.sess.source_map(); | ||
// If the span of rhs_expr or lhs_expr is in an external macro, | ||
// we should not suggest to swap the equality. See issue #139050 | ||
if rhs_expr.span.in_external_macro(sm) || lhs_expr.span.in_external_macro(sm) { | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Now I checked both. |
||
if let Ok(rhs_snippet) = sm.span_to_snippet(rhs_expr.span) | ||
&& let Ok(lhs_snippet) = sm.span_to_snippet(lhs_expr.span) | ||
{ | ||
|
13 changes: 13 additions & 0 deletions
13
tests/ui/typeck/suggestions/sugg-swap-equality-in-macro-issue-139050.rs
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ | ||
// if we use lhs == rhs in a macro, we should not suggest to swap the equality | ||
// because the origin span of lhs and rhs can not be found. See issue #139050 | ||
|
||
use std::fmt::Debug; | ||
|
||
pub fn foo<I: Iterator>(mut iter: I, value: &I::Item) | ||
where | ||
Item: Eq + Debug, //~ ERROR cannot find type `Item` in this scope [E0412] | ||
{ | ||
debug_assert_eq!(iter.next(), Some(value)); //~ ERROR mismatched types [E0308] | ||
assert_eq!(iter.next(), Some(value)); //~ ERROR mismatched types [E0308] | ||
} | ||
fn main() {} |
28 changes: 28 additions & 0 deletions
28
tests/ui/typeck/suggestions/sugg-swap-equality-in-macro-issue-139050.stderr
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ | ||
error[E0412]: cannot find type `Item` in this scope | ||
--> $DIR/sugg-swap-equality-in-macro-issue-139050.rs:8:5 | ||
| | ||
LL | Item: Eq + Debug, | ||
| ^^^^ not found in this scope | ||
|
||
error[E0308]: mismatched types | ||
--> $DIR/sugg-swap-equality-in-macro-issue-139050.rs:10:35 | ||
| | ||
LL | debug_assert_eq!(iter.next(), Some(value)); | ||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `Option<<I as Iterator>::Item>`, found `Option<&<I as Iterator>::Item>` | ||
| | ||
= note: expected enum `Option<_>` | ||
found enum `Option<&_>` | ||
|
||
error[E0308]: mismatched types | ||
--> $DIR/sugg-swap-equality-in-macro-issue-139050.rs:11:29 | ||
| | ||
LL | assert_eq!(iter.next(), Some(value)); | ||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `Option<<I as Iterator>::Item>`, found `Option<&<I as Iterator>::Item>` | ||
| | ||
= note: expected enum `Option<_>` | ||
found enum `Option<&_>` | ||
|
||
error: aborting due to 3 previous errors | ||
|
||
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0308, E0412. | ||
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0308`. |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is another copy of
suggest_swapping_lhs_and_rhs
inrustc_trait_selection
. Could you please add this check to that, too, since I think it suffers from the same issue.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I'll also look for a test case for that tomorrow.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't really think it needs a test case, but if you want to add one it's probably something like:
upstream crate:
downstream crate:
Pay attention to the fact that it's a trait error and there may already be some macro suppression going on there 🤔