Fix --skip-std-check-if-no-download-rustc
#143707
Merged
+31
−7
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Thanks a lot for the quick fix. :) r? bootstrap |
|
r? @jieyouxu |
|
@rustbot author |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-author
Since rust-lang#143048, we now explicitly set the build compiler for `check::Std`, which caused it to be built before we checked `--skip-std-check-if-no-download-rustc`. So I moved the check earlier to `make_run`, which resolves it. I also added a regression test for this. Sadly we can't really test for the positive case easily (when download-ci-rustc is enabled), but we can test the negative cases, where it is disabled.
Kobzol
force-pushed
the
bootstrap-std-check
branch
from
f65c6c7 to
3e675f4
Compare
|
@bors r=jieyouxu |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
tgross35
added a commit
to tgross35/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 10, 2025
…ouxu Fix `--skip-std-check-if-no-download-rustc` Since rust-lang#143048, we now explicitly set the build compiler for `check::Std`, which caused it to be built before we checked `--skip-std-check-if-no-download-rustc`. So I moved the check earlier to `make_run`, which resolves it. I also added a regression test for this. Sadly we can't really test for the positive case easily (when download-ci-rustc is enabled), but we can test the negative cases, where it is disabled. Fixes: rust-lang#143705 r? `@RalfJung`
tgross35
added a commit
to tgross35/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 10, 2025
…ouxu Fix `--skip-std-check-if-no-download-rustc` Since rust-lang#143048, we now explicitly set the build compiler for `check::Std`, which caused it to be built before we checked `--skip-std-check-if-no-download-rustc`. So I moved the check earlier to `make_run`, which resolves it. I also added a regression test for this. Sadly we can't really test for the positive case easily (when download-ci-rustc is enabled), but we can test the negative cases, where it is disabled. Fixes: rust-lang#143705 r? ``@RalfJung``
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 10, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #140136 (Add an aarch64-msvc build running on ARM64 Windows) - #143642 (stdarch subtree update) - #143679 (Preserve the .debug_gdb_scripts section) - #143707 (Fix `--skip-std-check-if-no-download-rustc`) - #143722 (Make some "safe" llvm ops actually sound) - #143728 (Resolve refactor: extraction of `finalize_module_binding` and `single_import_can_define_name`) - #143742 (Rework borrowing suggestions to use `Expr` instead of just `Span`) - #143744 (Properly track the depth when expanding free alias types) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2025
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #140136 (Add an aarch64-msvc build running on ARM64 Windows) - #143642 (stdarch subtree update) - #143707 (Fix `--skip-std-check-if-no-download-rustc`) - #143722 (Make some "safe" llvm ops actually sound) - #143728 (Resolve refactor: extraction of `finalize_module_binding` and `single_import_can_define_name`) - #143742 (Rework borrowing suggestions to use `Expr` instead of just `Span`) - #143744 (Properly track the depth when expanding free alias types) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2025
Rollup merge of #143707 - Kobzol:bootstrap-std-check, r=jieyouxu Fix `--skip-std-check-if-no-download-rustc` Since #143048, we now explicitly set the build compiler for `check::Std`, which caused it to be built before we checked `--skip-std-check-if-no-download-rustc`. So I moved the check earlier to `make_run`, which resolves it. I also added a regression test for this. Sadly we can't really test for the positive case easily (when download-ci-rustc is enabled), but we can test the negative cases, where it is disabled. Fixes: #143705 r? ```@RalfJung```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since #143048, we now explicitly set the build compiler for
check::Std, which caused it to be built before we checked--skip-std-check-if-no-download-rustc. So I moved the check earlier tomake_run, which resolves it.I also added a regression test for this. Sadly we can't really test for the positive case easily (when download-ci-rustc is enabled), but we can test the negative cases, where it is disabled.
Fixes: #143705
r? @RalfJung