Skip to content

Conversation

@hkBst
Copy link
Member

@hkBst hkBst commented Mar 4, 2025

This is an attempt at excluding less impactful changes from #136689.

r? @RalfJung

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 4, 2025
/// according to the requirements of the variable's type. For example, a variable of
/// reference type must be aligned and non-null. This is an invariant that must
/// Every variable must be properly initialized according to the requirements of its type.
/// For example, a variable of reference type must be aligned and non-null. This is an invariant that must
Copy link
Member

@RalfJung RalfJung Mar 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're still dong changes here without explaining the rhyme or reason for them. What is wrong with the sentence that you changed here, the first sentence of this section?

Sorry, I'm already swamped with reviews, I really don't have the time to tease out the meaningful changes from the gratuitous rewordings in a PR like this.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The idea here is to remove the distraction of mentioning the compiler. (Since it is really the language definition that matters, not what the compiler assumes...)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is the rigorous way of talking about it, but not the most accessible way. We have to be careful not to turn the docs into unreadable (to most of the audience) legalese.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In what way did my change make the text less accessible here? My change simplifies the text, while also making it more correct.

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

RalfJung commented Mar 5, 2025

r? libs-api
I don't have the time to deal with pure rewording PRs currently, especially not if there's meaningful changes that have a specific intent mixed with gratuitous rewording. I was asking for clear justification for every single change, which this PR still does not provide.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Mar 5, 2025
@rustbot rustbot assigned BurntSushi and unassigned RalfJung Mar 5, 2025
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

RalfJung commented Mar 5, 2025

Please decide how yo want to continue with this: close one of #136689 or this PR, and then for the remaining PR, if you want me to review it I'd like you to explain every single change on a paragraph-by-paragraph basis. If that feels like too much, you're doing too many changes in one PR, so please cut it down -- there can always be a next PR. Smaller PRs are a lot easier to review.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 20, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #138714) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

@hkBst any updates on this? thanks

@rust-cloud-vms rust-cloud-vms bot force-pushed the clarify_maybe_uninit_docs branch from 124cd85 to 6079eee Compare October 24, 2025 11:03
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 24, 2025

This PR was rebased onto a different master commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

@rust-cloud-vms rust-cloud-vms bot force-pushed the clarify_maybe_uninit_docs branch from 6079eee to 1382376 Compare October 24, 2025 12:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants