[WIP] Linker flavors: next steps #119906
Closed
[WIP] Linker flavors: next steps #119906
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
These commits modify compiler targets. |
petrochenkov
added
S-waiting-on-author
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
Let's talk about one of the hard problems in CS. Linker flavor namingThe base component is unfortunately neededIt would be nice to just drop the base flavor components (like gnu/darwin/wasm/etc) from user-facing flavors and leave only generic Generic flavorsI think usually the user intent behind generic flavors can be worded as "enable lld", or "enable clang", or "disable C compiler and use bare linker". So, with this +/- generic flavors would look like this.
The alternatives to that are names like Naming full flavors after generic flavorsWhat if we apply the +/- idea to full flavors? Existing flavors will turn into or into if we drop negatives, or into if we drop commas as well (looks farther from generic flavors).
ConclusionsI'm not sure, basically. Or change full flavors to the |
|
@rustbot ready (on the design, not implementation) |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
lqd
reviewed
Jan 16, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
On the design and direction:
- a possibly nice thing I wasn't anticipating with the clang flavor is they'd simplify our wasm targets specs (it's maybe one of the WIP bits of the PR, as I'm not yet sure it's fully implemented just by reading the code, since these targets -- or the apple ones -- shouldn't have a flavor where
uses_clangreturns true inadd_lld_args?) - since the clang-specific features won't be used or referenced very often in the compiler or specs, do you think
Ccas today'sYes/Nowith theYesvariant itself gaining the two cc kinds would be better or worse than the 3-variantCcas shown here? My thoughts are we should be using/checking forCc::Yesbasically everywhere and otherwise will now have to check if it's yes or clang. Reading these made me wonder whetherCc::Yes(_)would nicely encode this property of "de-emphasizing" the clang variant in general, and look for it inCc::Yes(compiler_flavor)only when needed. - I find the idea of generic flavors interesting, as we expect it's a simplification for users that want the implicit default, compared to having to pick the system-specific flavor. However, I agree that it makes the design space of linker flavors larger, and increases friction with the dash confusion, as well as impacting regular flavor names where it may not (or should not) need to do so. Your exploration and conclusion above shows this quite clearly I feel. It's possible that we can reduce the design space here if we chose to limit this to a different flag, like
-Clinker-flavor-features, to keep the existing flavors and naming (including the new clang flavors, and without issues withllvm-bc) free from these concerns. A new attribute is suboptimal for sure, but also has the advantage of keeping-Clinker-flavorfully explicit, while the new attribute would be about "applying modifiers to the implicit default flavor". Generic flavors could be an increase in complexity for what should generally be a niche use-case (though a nice UX when you hit that specific use-case). Then again, maybe the dash confusion isn't that big of a deal (and it's better than having+/-in the full flavors) and-Clinker-flavor=+lld,-ccis obvious enough as modifiers, without the base value. We can document it well enough, and it's quite understandable as shorthand when shown next to the actual full flavors (and has the benefit of not needing to remember the component order in the flavor, as-Clinker-flavor=*-lld-ccin+/-terms would be*-lld-*and easily confused with an incorrect*-*-lld). So the question is: picking the least bad option between-Clinker-flavorwith possible dash confusion, and having the generic flavors as another flag.
Comment on lines
+2223
to
+2224
| insert(LinkerFlavor::Gnu(Cc::Clang, Lld::No)); | ||
| insert(LinkerFlavor::Gnu(Cc::Clang, Lld::Yes)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Possibly still WIP: these linker args should have a WasmLld or Unix principal flavor here, rather than Gnu?
Yes, the current state of the PR is a sketch, apple targets should switch to clang as the default flavor, and
Maybe, but it's a big churn, probably not worth doing until everything stabilizes for sure. |
Looking at the diff, I agree. Let's keep the 3-variant enum for now and once we're a bit surer about the overall structure (components, order, naming, etc) we'll clean these up easily. |
So, I thought maybe we should do a 180 degree turn and shift all the logic except principal flavors to Feature flags are a more flexible mechanism than current linker flavors, in general.
|
jschwe
reviewed
Jan 18, 2024
Comment on lines
+2287
to
+2288
| if flavor.uses_clang() && sess.target.linker_flavor != sess.host.linker_flavor { | ||
| cmd.arg(format!("--target={}", sess.target.llvm_target)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this condition sufficient for the general case of adding --target when cross-compiling? The linker flavor doesn't contain any information about the target triple (unless I'm missing something), so I don't see how this can reliably detect cross-compiling.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
From what I know --target only affects which linker is looked up (ld.lld, or ld64.lld, etc) if clang is used for linking only.
So if the required flavor is the same as host, then clang without --target will already use the right linker.
On the other hand, there are some issues with crt object versions on macOS if --target is specified (fixed by #101792), maybe target takes priority over some relevant environment variables.
So always passing --target leads to issues.
We'll likely need to tweak this logic based on reported issues.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For lld this may not matter, since lld is also a cross-linker.
My main concern is if gnu ld is used (linker flavor (Cc::Clang, Lld::No) for both host and target), then --target is required for clang to select e.g. aarch64-linux-gnu-ld instead of just ld.
That's a very interesting twist! That could unify a bunch of disparate code-paths and flags/options (and should also work for self-contained linking features), as well as simplify use with a single entry-point, It feels like it should simplify our current setup, and this PR's flavors of course, but were you also imagining using this for the generic flavors? (I don't think so?) |
Well, |
|
Sure, like I described in my earlier comment. Overall, I personally find this direction promising. A bunch of the support code could also be based on renaming the self-contained linking components to "linker features" (w/ a prefix), adding |
Could you elaborate, I don't understand this part. |
|
I meant you could imagine the possible linker features as a generalization of self-contained linking components. And get an approximation of how that'd look like by renaming |
|
I see, I suspected that, but it seems far enough from linker features, if they are understood as something representing linker interface. |
|
Ok, then let’s not merge linker-features and self-contained linking components. |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #120468) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
|
To summarize, the use-cases were:
The other arguments for linker features:
In a future where So now we can also wonder if What do you think @petrochenkov? (It seems we already had shared ideas about the design, so I'm not sure if this was really waiting-on-review, @rustbot author) |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-author
I just r+'d the LLVM bitcode linker today - #117458, it should land soon. |
+ |
|
Sorry for the delay.
My point in general was that we should not make the "single principal flavor for a target" an axiom. "Windows GNU LLD" is a thin wrapper over "Windows MSVC LLD" that only translates command line options from one format to another. |
|
All the remaining part makes sense to me, except I'm still skeptical about moving the "self-contained" bit to the linker flavor/features. ("Self-contained" and other features will even be processed in different parts of the compiler because the latter is about linker command line interface, and the former is about directories included into |
|
I'll close this PR because it's only used for discussion, and the changes themselves are going to be implemented in a different way. |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 13, 2024
Linker flavors next steps: linker features This is my understanding of the first step towards `@petrochenkov's` vision for the future of linker flavors, described in rust-lang#119906 (comment) and the discussion that followed. To summarize: having `Cc` and `Lld` embedded in linker flavors creates tension about naming, and a combinatorial explosion of flavors for each new linker feature we'd want to use. Linker features are an extension mechanism that is complementary to principal flavors, with benefits described in rust-lang#119906. The most immediate use of this flag would be to turn self-contained linking on and off via features instead of flavors. For example, `-Clinker-features=+/-lld` would toggle using lld instead of selecting a precise flavor, and would be "generic" and work cross-platform (whereas linker flavors are currently more tied to targets). Under this scheme, MCP510 is expected to be `-Clink-self-contained=+linker -Zlinker-features=+lld -Zunstable-options` (though for the time being, the original flags using lld-cc flavors still work). I purposefully didn't add or document CLI support for `+/-cc`, as it would be a noop right now. I only expect that we'd initially want to stabilize `+/-lld` to begin with. r? `@petrochenkov` You had requested that minimal churn would be done to the 230 target specs and this does none yet: the linker features are inferred from the flavor since they're currently isomorphic. We of course expect this to change sooner rather than later. In the future, we can allow targets to define linker features independently from their flavor, and remove the cc and lld components from the flavors to use the features instead, this actually doesn't need to block stabilization, as we discussed. (Best reviewed per commit)
rust-bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2025
Use lld by default on `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` stable This PR and stabilization report is joint work with `@Kobzol.` #### Use LLD on `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` by default, and stabilize `-Clinker-features=-lld` and `-Clink-self-contained=-linker` This PR proposes making LLD the default linker on the `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` target for the artifacts we distribute, and also stabilizing the `-Clinker-features=-lld` and `-Clink-self-contained=-linker` codegen options to make it possible to opt out. LLD has been used as the default linker on nightly and CI on this target since May 2024 ([PR](#124129), [blog post](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/17/enabling-rust-lld-on-linux.html)), and it seems like it is working fine, so we would like to propose stabilizing it. The main motivation for using LLD instead of the default BFD linker is improving [compilation times](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=b3e117044c7f707293edc040edb93e7ec5f7040a&end=baed03c51a68376c1789cc373581eea0daf89967&stat=instructions%3Au&tab=compile). For example, in the linked benchmark, it makes incremental recompilation of `ripgrep` in `debug` more than twice faster. Another benefit is that Rust compilation becomes more consistent and self-contained, because we will use a known version of the LLD linker, rather than "whatever GNU ld version is on the user's system". Due to the performance benefit being so huge, many people already opt into using LLD (or other fast linkers, such as mold) using various approaches ([1](https://github.com/search?type=code&q=%2Flinker-flavor%5B%3D+%5Dgnu-lld-cc%2F), [2](https://github.com/search?type=code&q=%2Flinker-features%5B%3D+%5D%5C%2Blld%2F), [3](https://github.com/search?type=code&q=language%3Atoml+%22-fuse-ld%3Dlld%22), [4](https://github.com/search?type=code&q=language%3Arust+%22-fuse-ld%3Dlld%22)). By making LLD the default linker on the `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` target, we will be able to speed up Rust compilation out of the box, without users having to opt in or know about it. > You can find an extended version of this stabilization report which includes analysis of crater results and more data [here](https://hackmd.io/tFDifkUcSLGoHPBRIl0z8w?view). ## What is being stabilized - `rust-lld` being used as the default linker on the `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` target. - Note that `rust-lld` is being enabled by default in the compiler artifacts distributed by our CI/rustup. It is still possible to use the system linker by default using `rust.lld = false` in `bootstrap.toml`, which can be useful e.g. for some Linux distros that might not want to use the LLD we distribute. - This is done by activating the LLD linker feature and using the self-contained linker on that target. Both of which are also usable on the CLI, if some opt outs are necessary, as described below. - `-Clinker-features=-lld` on the `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` target. This codegen option tells rustc to disable using the LLD linker. - Note that other options for this codegen flag (`cc`) remain unstable. - Note that only the opt-out is being stabilized, and only for `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`: opting in, or using the flag on other targets would still need to pass `-Zunstable-options`. - This flag is being stabilized so that users can opt out of LLD on stable, which would it turn also opt out of using the self-contained linker (since it's an LLD). - `-Clink-self-contained=-linker`. This codegen option tells rustc to use the self-contained linker. It's not particularly useful to turn it on by itself, but when enabled and combined with `-Clinker-features=+lld`, rustc will use the `rust-lld` linker wrapper shipped with the compiler toolchain, instead of some `lld` binary that the linker driver will find in the `PATH`. - Note that other options for this codegen flag (other than the previously stable `y/yes/n/no`). - Note that only the opt-out is being stabilized, and only for `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`: opting in, or using this flag on other targets would still need to pass `-Zunstable-options`. - This flag is being stabilized so that users can opt out of using self-contained linking on stable. Doing this would then fall back to using the system `lld`. To opt out of using LLD, `RUSTFLAGS="-Clinker-features=-lld"` would be used. To opt out of using `rust-lld`, falling back to the LLD installed on the system, `RUSTFLAGS="-Clink-self-contained=-linker"` would be used. ## Tests When enabling `rust-lld` on nightly, we also switched x64 linux to use it at stage >= 1, meaning that all tests have been running with lld since May 2024, on CI as well as contributors' machines. (Post opt-dist tests also had been using it when running their test subset earlier than that). There are also a few tests dedicated to the CLI behavior, or ensuring the default linker is indeed the one we expect: - [link-self-contained-consistency](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/ui/linking/link-self-contained-consistency.rs): Checks that `-Clink-self-contained` options are not inconsistent (i.e. that passing both `+linker` and `-linker` is an error). - [link-self-contained-unstable](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/ui/linking/link-self-contained-unstable.rs): Checks that only the `-linker` and `y/yes/n/no` options for `-Clink-self-contained` are stable. - [linker-features-unstable-cc](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/ui/linking/linker-features-unstable-cc.rs): Checks that only the non-lld options of `-Clinker-features` are unstable. - [linker-features-lld-disallowed](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/ui/linking/linker-features-lld-disallowed.rs): Checks that `-Clinker-features=-lld` is only stable on `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`. - [link-self-contained-linker-disallowed](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/ui/linking/link-self-contained-linker-disallowed.rs): Checks that `-Clink-self-contained=-linker` is only stable on `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`. - [no-gc-encapsulation-symbols](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/ui/linking/no-gc-encapsulation-symbols.rs): Checks that that linker encapsulation symbols are not garbage collected by LLD, so that crates like [linkme](https://github.com/dtolnay/linkme) still work. - [rust-lld](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/run-make/rust-lld): Checks that LLD is actually used when enabled with `-Clinker-features=+lld` and `-Clink-self-contained=+linker`. - [rust-lld-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/run-make/rust-lld-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu): Checks that LLD is used by default on `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` when the bootstrap `rust.lld` config option is `true`. - [rust-lld-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-dist](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/run-make/rust-lld-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-dist): Dist test that checks that our distributed `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` archives actually use LLD by default. ## Ecosystem impact As already stated, LLD has been used as the default linker on x64 Linux on nightly for almost a year, and we haven't seen any blockers to stabilization in that time. There were a handful of issues reported, these are discussed later below. Furthermore, two crater runs ([November 2023](https://crater-reports.s3.amazonaws.com/pr-117684-2/index.html), [February 2025](https://crater-reports.s3.amazonaws.com/pr-137044-3/index.html)), were performed to test the impact of using LLD as the default linker. A triage of the earlier crater run was previously done [here](https://hackmd.io/OAJxlxc6Te6YUot9ftYSKQ), but all the important findings from both crater runs are reported below. Below is a list of compatibility differences between BFD and LLD that we have encountered. There is a more thorough list of differences in [this post](https://maskray.me/blog/2020-12-19-lld-and-gnu-linker-incompatibilities) from the current LLD maintainer. From that post, "99.9% pieces of software work with ld.lld without a change". --- ### `.ctors/.dtors` sections [#128286](#128286) reported an issue where LLD was unable to link certain CUDA library was using these sections that were using the `.ctors/.dtors` ELF sections. These were deprecated a long time ago (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46770), replaced with a more modern `.init_array/.fini_array` sections. LLD doesn't (and won't) support these sections ([1](llvm/llvm-project#68071), [2](llvm/llvm-project#30572)), so if they appear in input object files, the linked artifact might produce incorrect behavior, because e.g. some global variables might not get initialized properly. However, the usage of `.ctors/.dtors` should be very rare in practice. We have performed a [crater run](#137044) to test this. It has identified only 8 crates where the `.ctors/.dtors` section is occurring in the final linked artifact. It was caused by a few crates using the `.ctors` link section manually, and by using a very (~6 year) old version of the [ctor](https://crates.io/crates/ctor) crate. [Crater run analysis](https://hackmd.io/tFDifkUcSLGoHPBRIl0z8w?view#ctorsdtors-sections) **Possible workaround** It is possible to [detect](e5e2316) if `.ctors/.dtors` section is present in the final linked artifact (LLD will keep it there, but it won't be populated), and warn users about it. This check is very cheap and doesn't even appear on [perf](#112049 (comment)). We have benchmarked the check on a 240 MiB Chrome binary, where it took 0.8ms with page cache flushed, and 0.06ms with page cache primed (which should be the common case, as the linked artifact is written to disk just before the check is performed). In theory, this could be also solved with a linker script that moves `.ctors` to `.init_array`. We think that these sections should be so rare that it is not worth it to implement any workarounds for now. --- ### Different garbage collection behavior [#130397](#130397) reported an issue where LLD prunes a local symbol, so it is missing in the linked artifact. However, BFD keeps the same symbol, so it is a regression. This is caused by a difference in linker garbage collection. Rust uses `--gc-sections` and puts each function into a separate linker section, which prunes unused code. There is some code (specifically the somewhat popular [linkme](https://github.com/dtolnay/linkme) crate) that (arguably ab-)uses so called linker encapsulation symbols to achieve distributed slices. BFD (2.37+) uses a conservative linking mode that works as intended with this behavior, but it might slightly increase binary size of the linked artifact. LLD does not use this workaround by default, which causes the sections to be eliminated, but it can be made to use the conservative mode using [`-z nostart-stop-gc`](https://lld.llvm.org/ELF/start-stop-gc.html#z-start-stop-gc). To avoid this issue, we told LLD to use the [conservative mode](#137685), which maintains backwards compatibility with BFD. We found that it has [no effect](#112049 (comment)) on compilation performance and binary size in our benchmark suite. With this change, `linkme` works. Since then, #140872 removed `linkme` distributed slice's dependence on conservative GC behavior, so this PR also removes that conservative mode: no transition period is necessary, as the PR immediately fixed the crate with no source changes. [Crater run analysis](https://hackmd.io/tFDifkUcSLGoHPBRIl0z8w?view#Different-garbage-collection-behavior) --- ### Various uncommon issues A small number of issues that only occurred in a handful of instances were found in crater, and it is unclear if LLD is at fault or if there is some other issue that was not detected with BFD. You can examine these [here](https://hackmd.io/tFDifkUcSLGoHPBRIl0z8w?view#Various-uncommon-issues). --- ### Missing jobserver support LLD doesn't support the jobserver protocol for limiting the number of threads used, it simply defaults to using all available cores, and is one of the reasons why it's faster than BFD. However, this should mostly be a non-issue, because most of the linking done during high parallelism sections of `cargo build` is linking of build scripts and proc macros, which are typically very fast to link (e.g. ~50ms), and a potential oversubscription of cores thus doesn't hurt that much. When the final artifact is linked (which typically takes the most time), there should be no other sources of parallelism conflicts from compiling other code, so LLD should be able to use all available threads. That being said, it is a difference of behavior, where previously a `-j` flag was generally not using more cpu than the specified limit. It can be impactful in some resource-constrained systems, but to be clear that is already the case today due to [cargo parallelism](rust-lang/cargo#9157). This could be one reason to opt out of using `rust-lld` on some systems. LLD has support for limiting the number of threads to use, so in theory rustc could try to get all the jobserver tokens available and use that as lld's thread limit. It'd still be suboptimal as new tokens would not be dynamically detected, and we could be using less threads than available. We did a benchmark on a real-world crate that shows that using multiple LLD threads for intermediate artifacts doesn't seem to have a performance effect. You can find it [here](https://hackmd.io/tFDifkUcSLGoHPBRIl0z8w?view#Missing-jobserver-support). --- #### Opting out of LLD in the ecosystem We have also examined repositories where people opted out of LLD on nightly, using [this GitHub query](https://github.com/search?q=%22linker-features%3D-lld%22&type=code). The summary can be found below: <details> <summary>Summary of LLD opt outs</summary> > This examination was performed on 2025-03-09. Here we briefly examine the most common reasons why people use `-Zlinker-features=-lld`, based on comments and git history. - Nix/NixOS ([1](https://github.com/rszyma/vscode-kanata/blob/59d703dff5a238b14ab3759cac27f73fb34bbcfe/flake.nix#L33), [2](https://github.com/sbernauer/breakwater/blob/3cc3449fc126c5c99d4a971733fd32be589884e0/.cargo/config.toml#L4), [3](https://github.com/tiiuae/ebpf-firewall/blame/32bdb17cedd1c9bea1ab3482623de458d95da7d0/.cargo/config.toml#L2), [4](https://github.com/jules-sommer/wavetheme-gen/blob/f5f657d014d4a30607625afb70f810c229c0294e/Cargo.toml#L4), [5](https://github.com/LayerTwo-Labs/zside-rust/blob/e4266f5c5571a1b180a9c70cf0939c7070e410c7/.cargo/config.toml#L10), [6](https://github.com/przyjacielpkp/zkml/blob/22a4aef24e9d2c77789229d7c634fc67e9eb1184/README.md?plain=1#L78), [7](https://github.com/LayerTwo-Labs/thunder-rust/blob/2222d53474c8d2d0428b4c56f8157095dced6d5a/.cargo/config.toml#L2), [8](https://github.com/enesoztrk/nixos-tc-aya-test/blob/b2ffa59d3eba8b60fd04b0a4c8bbe047400eb981/.cargo/config.toml#L4), [9](https://github.com/lowRISC/container-hotplug/blob/3ead4ef9c7f79c303392178c99677dbecff1aea6/.cargo/config.toml#L2), [10](https://github.com/Eliah-Lakhin/ad-astra/blob/ca6b8c8a5dba7bb5e894f3f1013f17876962a021/work/examples/lsp-client/src/extension.ts#L94)) - There was an [issue](NixOS/nixpkgs#312661) with LLD, which seems to have been fixed with NixOS/nixpkgs#314268. It's unclear whether that fixed all the Nix issues though. - Issues with linkme ([1](https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/zk_evm/blob/ef388619ffbd5305209519a3a5bc0396185d68ac/.cargo/config.toml#L4), [2](https://github.com/conjure-cp/conjure-oxide/blob/be0fc5827ff90e8486d416cc184b6ce24f73bf01/README.md?plain=1#L20), [3](https://github.com/clchiou/garage/blob/c5d8444d56bb6ee24ca95e5c6b9880ed996f4918/rust/.cargo/config.toml#L6), [4](https://github.com/PonasKovas/craftflow/blob/5b4cc1a5196e08a975368399fefda4b71f3a2f6f/.cargo/config.toml#L3), [5](https://github.com/kezhuw/zookeeper-client-rust/blob/4e27c7de2a7cc5e709af012b791c8fea9bb47f1f/.github/workflows/ci.yml#L82), [6](https://github.com/niklasdewally/conjure-oxide/blob/8fe60c12bca7011a2f9eded4b7c95ad0e77b6f44/.github/workflows/code-coverage.yml#L48), [7](https://github.com/kezhuw/spawns/blob/c8b468379805de9df3287c01b94b4ed3db6b61ed/.github/workflows/ci.yml#L74)) - These should be resolved with the conservative garbage collection ([#137685](#137685)). - Bazel ([1](https://github.com/google-parfait/confidential-federated-compute/blob/1823f69ed8f5f4f819f7bfa21da1ca629fdc826b/.bazelrc#L71)), WASM ([1](https://github.com/Eliah-Lakhin/ad-astra/blob/ca6b8c8a5dba7bb5e894f3f1013f17876962a021/work/examples/wasm-build.sh#L37), [2](https://github.com/yacineb/pgrx-wasi-test/blob/2bf99037ca1b650b2cbc35f1257a87fb6ead0920/build.sh#L21)), uncategorized ([2](https://github.com/nbdd0121/r2vm/blob/5118be6b9e757c6fef2f019385873f403c23c548/.cargo/config.toml#L3), [3](https://github.com/Wyvern/Img/blame/45020c7e1dc4926c8129647014c708db0c13f463/.cargo/config.toml#L209), [4](https://github.com/arnaudpoullet/leptos-i18n-compile-error/blob/042eb835f7ca0dc36be67cf7fe65b35b22b6059f/README.md?plain=1#L89), [5](https://github.com/JonLeeCon/numerical-rust-cpu/blob/fd0b3006768ed81c56147044dc05c92b11b7b6f0/exercises/.cargo/config.toml#L13), [6](https://github.com/PonasKovas/shallowclone/blob/be65f2ec923cac6ceedbc8db520c89969ebfce7c/.github/workflows/rust.yml#L20)) - Reason unclear. </details> ## History The idea to use a faster linker by default has been on the radar for quite some time ([#39915](#39915), [#71515](#71515)). There were [very early attempts](#29974) to use the gold linker by default, but these had to be [reverted](#30913) because of compatibility issues. Support for LLD was implemented back in [2017](#40018), but it has not been made default yet, except for some more niche targets, such as [WASM](#48125), [ARM Cortex](#53648) or [RISC-V](#53822). It took quite some time to figure out how should the interface for selecting the linker (and the way it is invoked) look like, as it differs a lot between different platforms, linkers and compiler drivers. During that time, LLD has matured and achieved [almost perfect compatibility](https://maskray.me/blog/2020-12-19-lld-and-gnu-linker-incompatibilities) with the default Linux linker (BFD). - [#56351](#56351) stabilized `-Clinker-flavor`, which is used to determine how to invoke the linker. It is especially useful on targets where selecting the linker directly with `-Clinker` is not possible or is impractical. - December 2018, author `@davidtwco,` reviewer `@nagisa` - [#76158](#76158) stabilized `-Clink-self-contained=[y|n]`, which allows overriding the compiler's heuristic for deciding whether it should use self-contained or external tools (linker, sanitizers, libc, etc.). It only allowed using the self-contained mode either for everything (`y`) or nothing (`n`), but did not allow granular choice. - September 2020, author `@mati864,` reviewer `@petrochenkov` - [#85961](#85961) implemented the `-Zgcc-ld` flag, which was a hacky way of opting into LLD usage. - June 2021, author `@sledgehammervampire,` reviewer `@petrochenkov` - [MCP 510](rust-lang/compiler-team#510) proposed stabilizing the behavior of `-Zgcc-ld` using more granular flags (`-Clink-self-contained=linker -Clinker-flavor=gcc-lld`). - Initially implemented in [#96827](#96827), but `@petrochenkov` [suggested](#96827 (comment)) a slightly different approach. - The PR was split into [#96884](#96884), where it was decided what will be the individual components of `-Clink-self-contained=linker`. - And [#96401](#96401), which implemented the `-Clinker-flavor` part. - The MCP was finally implemented in [#112910](#112910). - [#116514](#116514) then removed `-Zgcc-ld`, as it was replaced by `-Clinker-flavor=gnu-lld-cc` + `-Clink-self-contained=linker`. - April 2022 - October 2023, author `@lqd,` reviewer `@petrochenkov` - Various linker handling refactorings were performed in the meantime: [#97375](#97375), [#98212](#98212), [#100126](#100126), [#100552](#100552), [#102836](#102836), [#110807](#110807), [#101988](#101988), [#116515](#116515) - The implementation of linker flavors with LLD was causing a sort of a combinatorial explosion of various options. [#119906](#119906) suggested a different approach for linker flavors (described [here](#119906 (comment))), where the individual flavors could be enabled separately using `+/-` (e.g. `+lld`). - After some back and forth, this idea was moved to `-Clinker-features` (see [comment 1](#119906 (comment)) and [comment 2](#119906 (comment))), which was implemented in [#123656](#123656). - April 2024, author `@lqd,` reviewer `@petrochenkov` - [#124129](#124129) enabled LLD by default on nightly. - April 2024, author `@lqd,` reviewer `@petrochenkov` - [#137685](#137685), [#137926](#137926) enabled the conservative gargage collection mode (`-znostart-stop-gc`) to improve compatibility with BFD. - February 2025, author `@lqd,` reviewer `@petrochenkov` (implementation), author `@kobzol,` reviewer `@lqd` (test) - [#96025](#96025) (April 2022), [#117684](#117684) (November 2023), [#137044](#137044) (February 2025): crater runs. ## Unresolved questions/concerns - Is changing the linker considered a breaking change? In (hopefully very rare) cases, it might break some existing code. It should mostly only affect the final linked artifact, so it should be easy to opt out. - Similarly, is the single-threaded behavior of such tools encompassed in our stability guarantee: it can be observed via the `-j` job limit (though I believe we have/had some open issues on sometimes using more CPU resources than the job count limit implied). As mentioned above, LLD does not support the jobserver protocol. - A concern [was raised](#71515 (comment)) about increased memory usage of LLD. We should probably let users know about the possibly increased memory usage, and jobserver incompatibility: we did so when announcing this landing on nightly. - LLD seems to produce [slightly larger](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=b3e117044c7f707293edc040edb93e7ec5f7040a&end=baed03c51a68376c1789cc373581eea0daf89967&stat=size%3Alinked_artifact&tab=compile) binary artifacts. This can be partially clawed back using Identical Code Folding (`-Clink-args=-Wl,--icf=all`). - Should we detect the outdated `.ctors/.dtors` sections to provide a better error message, even if that should be rare in practice? --- ### Next steps After the FCP completes: - we should land this PR at the beginning of a beta cycle, to maximize time for testing - keep an eye on the beta crater run results for possible linker issues (or do a dedicated beta crater run with only this change) - release a blog post announcing the change, and asking for testing feedback of the appropriate beta - depending on feedback, or if a period of testing of 6 weeks is not long enough, we could keep this change on beta for another cycle --- Development, testing, try builds were done in #138645. r? `@petrochenkov` `@rustbot` label +needs-fcp +T-compiler try-job: aarch64-gnu try-job: i686-gnu-*
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2025
Use lld by default on `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` stable This PR and stabilization report is joint work with `@Kobzol.` #### Use LLD on `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` by default, and stabilize `-Clinker-features=-lld` and `-Clink-self-contained=-linker` This PR proposes making LLD the default linker on the `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` target for the artifacts we distribute, and also stabilizing the `-Clinker-features=-lld` and `-Clink-self-contained=-linker` codegen options to make it possible to opt out. LLD has been used as the default linker on nightly and CI on this target since May 2024 ([PR](#124129), [blog post](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/17/enabling-rust-lld-on-linux.html)), and it seems like it is working fine, so we would like to propose stabilizing it. The main motivation for using LLD instead of the default BFD linker is improving [compilation times](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=b3e117044c7f707293edc040edb93e7ec5f7040a&end=baed03c51a68376c1789cc373581eea0daf89967&stat=instructions%3Au&tab=compile). For example, in the linked benchmark, it makes incremental recompilation of `ripgrep` in `debug` more than twice faster. Another benefit is that Rust compilation becomes more consistent and self-contained, because we will use a known version of the LLD linker, rather than "whatever GNU ld version is on the user's system". Due to the performance benefit being so huge, many people already opt into using LLD (or other fast linkers, such as mold) using various approaches ([1](https://github.com/search?type=code&q=%2Flinker-flavor%5B%3D+%5Dgnu-lld-cc%2F), [2](https://github.com/search?type=code&q=%2Flinker-features%5B%3D+%5D%5C%2Blld%2F), [3](https://github.com/search?type=code&q=language%3Atoml+%22-fuse-ld%3Dlld%22), [4](https://github.com/search?type=code&q=language%3Arust+%22-fuse-ld%3Dlld%22)). By making LLD the default linker on the `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` target, we will be able to speed up Rust compilation out of the box, without users having to opt in or know about it. > You can find an extended version of this stabilization report which includes analysis of crater results and more data [here](https://hackmd.io/tFDifkUcSLGoHPBRIl0z8w?view). ## What is being stabilized - `rust-lld` being used as the default linker on the `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` target. - Note that `rust-lld` is being enabled by default in the compiler artifacts distributed by our CI/rustup. It is still possible to use the system linker by default using `rust.lld = false` in `bootstrap.toml`, which can be useful e.g. for some Linux distros that might not want to use the LLD we distribute. - This is done by activating the LLD linker feature and using the self-contained linker on that target. Both of which are also usable on the CLI, if some opt outs are necessary, as described below. - `-Clinker-features=-lld` on the `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` target. This codegen option tells rustc to disable using the LLD linker. - Note that other options for this codegen flag (`cc`) remain unstable. - Note that only the opt-out is being stabilized, and only for `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`: opting in, or using the flag on other targets would still need to pass `-Zunstable-options`. - This flag is being stabilized so that users can opt out of LLD on stable, which would it turn also opt out of using the self-contained linker (since it's an LLD). - `-Clink-self-contained=-linker`. This codegen option tells rustc to use the self-contained linker. It's not particularly useful to turn it on by itself, but when enabled and combined with `-Clinker-features=+lld`, rustc will use the `rust-lld` linker wrapper shipped with the compiler toolchain, instead of some `lld` binary that the linker driver will find in the `PATH`. - Note that other options for this codegen flag (other than the previously stable `y/yes/n/no`). - Note that only the opt-out is being stabilized, and only for `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`: opting in, or using this flag on other targets would still need to pass `-Zunstable-options`. - This flag is being stabilized so that users can opt out of using self-contained linking on stable. Doing this would then fall back to using the system `lld`. To opt out of using LLD, `RUSTFLAGS="-Clinker-features=-lld"` would be used. To opt out of using `rust-lld`, falling back to the LLD installed on the system, `RUSTFLAGS="-Clink-self-contained=-linker"` would be used. ## Tests When enabling `rust-lld` on nightly, we also switched x64 linux to use it at stage >= 1, meaning that all tests have been running with lld since May 2024, on CI as well as contributors' machines. (Post opt-dist tests also had been using it when running their test subset earlier than that). There are also a few tests dedicated to the CLI behavior, or ensuring the default linker is indeed the one we expect: - [link-self-contained-consistency](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/ui/linking/link-self-contained-consistency.rs): Checks that `-Clink-self-contained` options are not inconsistent (i.e. that passing both `+linker` and `-linker` is an error). - [link-self-contained-unstable](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/ui/linking/link-self-contained-unstable.rs): Checks that only the `-linker` and `y/yes/n/no` options for `-Clink-self-contained` are stable. - [linker-features-unstable-cc](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/ui/linking/linker-features-unstable-cc.rs): Checks that only the non-lld options of `-Clinker-features` are unstable. - [linker-features-lld-disallowed](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/ui/linking/linker-features-lld-disallowed.rs): Checks that `-Clinker-features=-lld` is only stable on `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`. - [link-self-contained-linker-disallowed](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/ui/linking/link-self-contained-linker-disallowed.rs): Checks that `-Clink-self-contained=-linker` is only stable on `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`. - [no-gc-encapsulation-symbols](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/ui/linking/no-gc-encapsulation-symbols.rs): Checks that that linker encapsulation symbols are not garbage collected by LLD, so that crates like [linkme](https://github.com/dtolnay/linkme) still work. - [rust-lld](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/run-make/rust-lld): Checks that LLD is actually used when enabled with `-Clinker-features=+lld` and `-Clink-self-contained=+linker`. - [rust-lld-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/run-make/rust-lld-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu): Checks that LLD is used by default on `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` when the bootstrap `rust.lld` config option is `true`. - [rust-lld-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-dist](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/run-make/rust-lld-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-dist): Dist test that checks that our distributed `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` archives actually use LLD by default. ## Ecosystem impact As already stated, LLD has been used as the default linker on x64 Linux on nightly for almost a year, and we haven't seen any blockers to stabilization in that time. There were a handful of issues reported, these are discussed later below. Furthermore, two crater runs ([November 2023](https://crater-reports.s3.amazonaws.com/pr-117684-2/index.html), [February 2025](https://crater-reports.s3.amazonaws.com/pr-137044-3/index.html)), were performed to test the impact of using LLD as the default linker. A triage of the earlier crater run was previously done [here](https://hackmd.io/OAJxlxc6Te6YUot9ftYSKQ), but all the important findings from both crater runs are reported below. Below is a list of compatibility differences between BFD and LLD that we have encountered. There is a more thorough list of differences in [this post](https://maskray.me/blog/2020-12-19-lld-and-gnu-linker-incompatibilities) from the current LLD maintainer. From that post, "99.9% pieces of software work with ld.lld without a change". --- ### `.ctors/.dtors` sections [#128286](#128286) reported an issue where LLD was unable to link certain CUDA library was using these sections that were using the `.ctors/.dtors` ELF sections. These were deprecated a long time ago (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46770), replaced with a more modern `.init_array/.fini_array` sections. LLD doesn't (and won't) support these sections ([1](llvm/llvm-project#68071), [2](llvm/llvm-project#30572)), so if they appear in input object files, the linked artifact might produce incorrect behavior, because e.g. some global variables might not get initialized properly. However, the usage of `.ctors/.dtors` should be very rare in practice. We have performed a [crater run](#137044) to test this. It has identified only 8 crates where the `.ctors/.dtors` section is occurring in the final linked artifact. It was caused by a few crates using the `.ctors` link section manually, and by using a very (~6 year) old version of the [ctor](https://crates.io/crates/ctor) crate. [Crater run analysis](https://hackmd.io/tFDifkUcSLGoHPBRIl0z8w?view#ctorsdtors-sections) **Possible workaround** It is possible to [detect](e5e2316) if `.ctors/.dtors` section is present in the final linked artifact (LLD will keep it there, but it won't be populated), and warn users about it. This check is very cheap and doesn't even appear on [perf](#112049 (comment)). We have benchmarked the check on a 240 MiB Chrome binary, where it took 0.8ms with page cache flushed, and 0.06ms with page cache primed (which should be the common case, as the linked artifact is written to disk just before the check is performed). In theory, this could be also solved with a linker script that moves `.ctors` to `.init_array`. We think that these sections should be so rare that it is not worth it to implement any workarounds for now. --- ### Different garbage collection behavior [#130397](#130397) reported an issue where LLD prunes a local symbol, so it is missing in the linked artifact. However, BFD keeps the same symbol, so it is a regression. This is caused by a difference in linker garbage collection. Rust uses `--gc-sections` and puts each function into a separate linker section, which prunes unused code. There is some code (specifically the somewhat popular [linkme](https://github.com/dtolnay/linkme) crate) that (arguably ab-)uses so called linker encapsulation symbols to achieve distributed slices. BFD (2.37+) uses a conservative linking mode that works as intended with this behavior, but it might slightly increase binary size of the linked artifact. LLD does not use this workaround by default, which causes the sections to be eliminated, but it can be made to use the conservative mode using [`-z nostart-stop-gc`](https://lld.llvm.org/ELF/start-stop-gc.html#z-start-stop-gc). To avoid this issue, we told LLD to use the [conservative mode](#137685), which maintains backwards compatibility with BFD. We found that it has [no effect](#112049 (comment)) on compilation performance and binary size in our benchmark suite. With this change, `linkme` works. Since then, #140872 removed `linkme` distributed slice's dependence on conservative GC behavior, so this PR also removes that conservative mode: no transition period is necessary, as the PR immediately fixed the crate with no source changes. [Crater run analysis](https://hackmd.io/tFDifkUcSLGoHPBRIl0z8w?view#Different-garbage-collection-behavior) --- ### Various uncommon issues A small number of issues that only occurred in a handful of instances were found in crater, and it is unclear if LLD is at fault or if there is some other issue that was not detected with BFD. You can examine these [here](https://hackmd.io/tFDifkUcSLGoHPBRIl0z8w?view#Various-uncommon-issues). --- ### Missing jobserver support LLD doesn't support the jobserver protocol for limiting the number of threads used, it simply defaults to using all available cores, and is one of the reasons why it's faster than BFD. However, this should mostly be a non-issue, because most of the linking done during high parallelism sections of `cargo build` is linking of build scripts and proc macros, which are typically very fast to link (e.g. ~50ms), and a potential oversubscription of cores thus doesn't hurt that much. When the final artifact is linked (which typically takes the most time), there should be no other sources of parallelism conflicts from compiling other code, so LLD should be able to use all available threads. That being said, it is a difference of behavior, where previously a `-j` flag was generally not using more cpu than the specified limit. It can be impactful in some resource-constrained systems, but to be clear that is already the case today due to [cargo parallelism](rust-lang/cargo#9157). This could be one reason to opt out of using `rust-lld` on some systems. LLD has support for limiting the number of threads to use, so in theory rustc could try to get all the jobserver tokens available and use that as lld's thread limit. It'd still be suboptimal as new tokens would not be dynamically detected, and we could be using less threads than available. We did a benchmark on a real-world crate that shows that using multiple LLD threads for intermediate artifacts doesn't seem to have a performance effect. You can find it [here](https://hackmd.io/tFDifkUcSLGoHPBRIl0z8w?view#Missing-jobserver-support). --- #### Opting out of LLD in the ecosystem We have also examined repositories where people opted out of LLD on nightly, using [this GitHub query](https://github.com/search?q=%22linker-features%3D-lld%22&type=code). The summary can be found below: <details> <summary>Summary of LLD opt outs</summary> > This examination was performed on 2025-03-09. Here we briefly examine the most common reasons why people use `-Zlinker-features=-lld`, based on comments and git history. - Nix/NixOS ([1](https://github.com/rszyma/vscode-kanata/blob/59d703dff5a238b14ab3759cac27f73fb34bbcfe/flake.nix#L33), [2](https://github.com/sbernauer/breakwater/blob/3cc3449fc126c5c99d4a971733fd32be589884e0/.cargo/config.toml#L4), [3](https://github.com/tiiuae/ebpf-firewall/blame/32bdb17cedd1c9bea1ab3482623de458d95da7d0/.cargo/config.toml#L2), [4](https://github.com/jules-sommer/wavetheme-gen/blob/f5f657d014d4a30607625afb70f810c229c0294e/Cargo.toml#L4), [5](https://github.com/LayerTwo-Labs/zside-rust/blob/e4266f5c5571a1b180a9c70cf0939c7070e410c7/.cargo/config.toml#L10), [6](https://github.com/przyjacielpkp/zkml/blob/22a4aef24e9d2c77789229d7c634fc67e9eb1184/README.md?plain=1#L78), [7](https://github.com/LayerTwo-Labs/thunder-rust/blob/2222d53474c8d2d0428b4c56f8157095dced6d5a/.cargo/config.toml#L2), [8](https://github.com/enesoztrk/nixos-tc-aya-test/blob/b2ffa59d3eba8b60fd04b0a4c8bbe047400eb981/.cargo/config.toml#L4), [9](https://github.com/lowRISC/container-hotplug/blob/3ead4ef9c7f79c303392178c99677dbecff1aea6/.cargo/config.toml#L2), [10](https://github.com/Eliah-Lakhin/ad-astra/blob/ca6b8c8a5dba7bb5e894f3f1013f17876962a021/work/examples/lsp-client/src/extension.ts#L94)) - There was an [issue](NixOS/nixpkgs#312661) with LLD, which seems to have been fixed with NixOS/nixpkgs#314268. It's unclear whether that fixed all the Nix issues though. - Issues with linkme ([1](https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/zk_evm/blob/ef388619ffbd5305209519a3a5bc0396185d68ac/.cargo/config.toml#L4), [2](https://github.com/conjure-cp/conjure-oxide/blob/be0fc5827ff90e8486d416cc184b6ce24f73bf01/README.md?plain=1#L20), [3](https://github.com/clchiou/garage/blob/c5d8444d56bb6ee24ca95e5c6b9880ed996f4918/rust/.cargo/config.toml#L6), [4](https://github.com/PonasKovas/craftflow/blob/5b4cc1a5196e08a975368399fefda4b71f3a2f6f/.cargo/config.toml#L3), [5](https://github.com/kezhuw/zookeeper-client-rust/blob/4e27c7de2a7cc5e709af012b791c8fea9bb47f1f/.github/workflows/ci.yml#L82), [6](https://github.com/niklasdewally/conjure-oxide/blob/8fe60c12bca7011a2f9eded4b7c95ad0e77b6f44/.github/workflows/code-coverage.yml#L48), [7](https://github.com/kezhuw/spawns/blob/c8b468379805de9df3287c01b94b4ed3db6b61ed/.github/workflows/ci.yml#L74)) - These should be resolved with the conservative garbage collection ([#137685](#137685)). - Bazel ([1](https://github.com/google-parfait/confidential-federated-compute/blob/1823f69ed8f5f4f819f7bfa21da1ca629fdc826b/.bazelrc#L71)), WASM ([1](https://github.com/Eliah-Lakhin/ad-astra/blob/ca6b8c8a5dba7bb5e894f3f1013f17876962a021/work/examples/wasm-build.sh#L37), [2](https://github.com/yacineb/pgrx-wasi-test/blob/2bf99037ca1b650b2cbc35f1257a87fb6ead0920/build.sh#L21)), uncategorized ([2](https://github.com/nbdd0121/r2vm/blob/5118be6b9e757c6fef2f019385873f403c23c548/.cargo/config.toml#L3), [3](https://github.com/Wyvern/Img/blame/45020c7e1dc4926c8129647014c708db0c13f463/.cargo/config.toml#L209), [4](https://github.com/arnaudpoullet/leptos-i18n-compile-error/blob/042eb835f7ca0dc36be67cf7fe65b35b22b6059f/README.md?plain=1#L89), [5](https://github.com/JonLeeCon/numerical-rust-cpu/blob/fd0b3006768ed81c56147044dc05c92b11b7b6f0/exercises/.cargo/config.toml#L13), [6](https://github.com/PonasKovas/shallowclone/blob/be65f2ec923cac6ceedbc8db520c89969ebfce7c/.github/workflows/rust.yml#L20)) - Reason unclear. </details> ## History The idea to use a faster linker by default has been on the radar for quite some time ([#39915](#39915), [#71515](#71515)). There were [very early attempts](#29974) to use the gold linker by default, but these had to be [reverted](#30913) because of compatibility issues. Support for LLD was implemented back in [2017](#40018), but it has not been made default yet, except for some more niche targets, such as [WASM](#48125), [ARM Cortex](#53648) or [RISC-V](#53822). It took quite some time to figure out how should the interface for selecting the linker (and the way it is invoked) look like, as it differs a lot between different platforms, linkers and compiler drivers. During that time, LLD has matured and achieved [almost perfect compatibility](https://maskray.me/blog/2020-12-19-lld-and-gnu-linker-incompatibilities) with the default Linux linker (BFD). - [#56351](#56351) stabilized `-Clinker-flavor`, which is used to determine how to invoke the linker. It is especially useful on targets where selecting the linker directly with `-Clinker` is not possible or is impractical. - December 2018, author `@davidtwco,` reviewer `@nagisa` - [#76158](#76158) stabilized `-Clink-self-contained=[y|n]`, which allows overriding the compiler's heuristic for deciding whether it should use self-contained or external tools (linker, sanitizers, libc, etc.). It only allowed using the self-contained mode either for everything (`y`) or nothing (`n`), but did not allow granular choice. - September 2020, author `@mati864,` reviewer `@petrochenkov` - [#85961](#85961) implemented the `-Zgcc-ld` flag, which was a hacky way of opting into LLD usage. - June 2021, author `@sledgehammervampire,` reviewer `@petrochenkov` - [MCP 510](rust-lang/compiler-team#510) proposed stabilizing the behavior of `-Zgcc-ld` using more granular flags (`-Clink-self-contained=linker -Clinker-flavor=gcc-lld`). - Initially implemented in [#96827](#96827), but `@petrochenkov` [suggested](#96827 (comment)) a slightly different approach. - The PR was split into [#96884](#96884), where it was decided what will be the individual components of `-Clink-self-contained=linker`. - And [#96401](#96401), which implemented the `-Clinker-flavor` part. - The MCP was finally implemented in [#112910](#112910). - [#116514](#116514) then removed `-Zgcc-ld`, as it was replaced by `-Clinker-flavor=gnu-lld-cc` + `-Clink-self-contained=linker`. - April 2022 - October 2023, author `@lqd,` reviewer `@petrochenkov` - Various linker handling refactorings were performed in the meantime: [#97375](#97375), [#98212](#98212), [#100126](#100126), [#100552](#100552), [#102836](#102836), [#110807](#110807), [#101988](#101988), [#116515](#116515) - The implementation of linker flavors with LLD was causing a sort of a combinatorial explosion of various options. [#119906](#119906) suggested a different approach for linker flavors (described [here](#119906 (comment))), where the individual flavors could be enabled separately using `+/-` (e.g. `+lld`). - After some back and forth, this idea was moved to `-Clinker-features` (see [comment 1](#119906 (comment)) and [comment 2](#119906 (comment))), which was implemented in [#123656](#123656). - April 2024, author `@lqd,` reviewer `@petrochenkov` - [#124129](#124129) enabled LLD by default on nightly. - April 2024, author `@lqd,` reviewer `@petrochenkov` - [#137685](#137685), [#137926](#137926) enabled the conservative gargage collection mode (`-znostart-stop-gc`) to improve compatibility with BFD. - February 2025, author `@lqd,` reviewer `@petrochenkov` (implementation), author `@kobzol,` reviewer `@lqd` (test) - [#96025](#96025) (April 2022), [#117684](#117684) (November 2023), [#137044](#137044) (February 2025): crater runs. ## Unresolved questions/concerns - Is changing the linker considered a breaking change? In (hopefully very rare) cases, it might break some existing code. It should mostly only affect the final linked artifact, so it should be easy to opt out. - Similarly, is the single-threaded behavior of such tools encompassed in our stability guarantee: it can be observed via the `-j` job limit (though I believe we have/had some open issues on sometimes using more CPU resources than the job count limit implied). As mentioned above, LLD does not support the jobserver protocol. - A concern [was raised](#71515 (comment)) about increased memory usage of LLD. We should probably let users know about the possibly increased memory usage, and jobserver incompatibility: we did so when announcing this landing on nightly. - LLD seems to produce [slightly larger](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=b3e117044c7f707293edc040edb93e7ec5f7040a&end=baed03c51a68376c1789cc373581eea0daf89967&stat=size%3Alinked_artifact&tab=compile) binary artifacts. This can be partially clawed back using Identical Code Folding (`-Clink-args=-Wl,--icf=all`). - Should we detect the outdated `.ctors/.dtors` sections to provide a better error message, even if that should be rare in practice? --- ### Next steps After the FCP completes: - we should land this PR at the beginning of a beta cycle, to maximize time for testing - keep an eye on the beta crater run results for possible linker issues (or do a dedicated beta crater run with only this change) - release a blog post announcing the change, and asking for testing feedback of the appropriate beta - depending on feedback, or if a period of testing of 6 weeks is not long enough, we could keep this change on beta for another cycle --- Development, testing, try builds were done in #138645. r? `@petrochenkov` `@rustbot` label +needs-fcp +T-compiler
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2025
Use lld by default on `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` stable This PR and stabilization report is joint work with `@Kobzol.` #### Use LLD on `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` by default, and stabilize `-Clinker-features=-lld` and `-Clink-self-contained=-linker` This PR proposes making LLD the default linker on the `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` target for the artifacts we distribute, and also stabilizing the `-Clinker-features=-lld` and `-Clink-self-contained=-linker` codegen options to make it possible to opt out. LLD has been used as the default linker on nightly and CI on this target since May 2024 ([PR](#124129), [blog post](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/17/enabling-rust-lld-on-linux.html)), and it seems like it is working fine, so we would like to propose stabilizing it. The main motivation for using LLD instead of the default BFD linker is improving [compilation times](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=b3e117044c7f707293edc040edb93e7ec5f7040a&end=baed03c51a68376c1789cc373581eea0daf89967&stat=instructions%3Au&tab=compile). For example, in the linked benchmark, it makes incremental recompilation of `ripgrep` in `debug` more than twice faster. Another benefit is that Rust compilation becomes more consistent and self-contained, because we will use a known version of the LLD linker, rather than "whatever GNU ld version is on the user's system". Due to the performance benefit being so huge, many people already opt into using LLD (or other fast linkers, such as mold) using various approaches ([1](https://github.com/search?type=code&q=%2Flinker-flavor%5B%3D+%5Dgnu-lld-cc%2F), [2](https://github.com/search?type=code&q=%2Flinker-features%5B%3D+%5D%5C%2Blld%2F), [3](https://github.com/search?type=code&q=language%3Atoml+%22-fuse-ld%3Dlld%22), [4](https://github.com/search?type=code&q=language%3Arust+%22-fuse-ld%3Dlld%22)). By making LLD the default linker on the `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` target, we will be able to speed up Rust compilation out of the box, without users having to opt in or know about it. > You can find an extended version of this stabilization report which includes analysis of crater results and more data [here](https://hackmd.io/tFDifkUcSLGoHPBRIl0z8w?view). ## What is being stabilized - `rust-lld` being used as the default linker on the `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` target. - Note that `rust-lld` is being enabled by default in the compiler artifacts distributed by our CI/rustup. It is still possible to use the system linker by default using `rust.lld = false` in `bootstrap.toml`, which can be useful e.g. for some Linux distros that might not want to use the LLD we distribute. - This is done by activating the LLD linker feature and using the self-contained linker on that target. Both of which are also usable on the CLI, if some opt outs are necessary, as described below. - `-Clinker-features=-lld` on the `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` target. This codegen option tells rustc to disable using the LLD linker. - Note that other options for this codegen flag (`cc`) remain unstable. - Note that only the opt-out is being stabilized, and only for `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`: opting in, or using the flag on other targets would still need to pass `-Zunstable-options`. - This flag is being stabilized so that users can opt out of LLD on stable, which would it turn also opt out of using the self-contained linker (since it's an LLD). - `-Clink-self-contained=-linker`. This codegen option tells rustc to use the self-contained linker. It's not particularly useful to turn it on by itself, but when enabled and combined with `-Clinker-features=+lld`, rustc will use the `rust-lld` linker wrapper shipped with the compiler toolchain, instead of some `lld` binary that the linker driver will find in the `PATH`. - Note that other options for this codegen flag (other than the previously stable `y/yes/n/no`). - Note that only the opt-out is being stabilized, and only for `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`: opting in, or using this flag on other targets would still need to pass `-Zunstable-options`. - This flag is being stabilized so that users can opt out of using self-contained linking on stable. Doing this would then fall back to using the system `lld`. To opt out of using LLD, `RUSTFLAGS="-Clinker-features=-lld"` would be used. To opt out of using `rust-lld`, falling back to the LLD installed on the system, `RUSTFLAGS="-Clink-self-contained=-linker"` would be used. ## Tests When enabling `rust-lld` on nightly, we also switched x64 linux to use it at stage >= 1, meaning that all tests have been running with lld since May 2024, on CI as well as contributors' machines. (Post opt-dist tests also had been using it when running their test subset earlier than that). There are also a few tests dedicated to the CLI behavior, or ensuring the default linker is indeed the one we expect: - [link-self-contained-consistency](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/ui/linking/link-self-contained-consistency.rs): Checks that `-Clink-self-contained` options are not inconsistent (i.e. that passing both `+linker` and `-linker` is an error). - [link-self-contained-unstable](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/ui/linking/link-self-contained-unstable.rs): Checks that only the `-linker` and `y/yes/n/no` options for `-Clink-self-contained` are stable. - [linker-features-unstable-cc](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/ui/linking/linker-features-unstable-cc.rs): Checks that only the non-lld options of `-Clinker-features` are unstable. - [linker-features-lld-disallowed](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/ui/linking/linker-features-lld-disallowed.rs): Checks that `-Clinker-features=-lld` is only stable on `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`. - [link-self-contained-linker-disallowed](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/ui/linking/link-self-contained-linker-disallowed.rs): Checks that `-Clink-self-contained=-linker` is only stable on `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`. - [no-gc-encapsulation-symbols](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/ui/linking/no-gc-encapsulation-symbols.rs): Checks that that linker encapsulation symbols are not garbage collected by LLD, so that crates like [linkme](https://github.com/dtolnay/linkme) still work. - [rust-lld](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/run-make/rust-lld): Checks that LLD is actually used when enabled with `-Clinker-features=+lld` and `-Clink-self-contained=+linker`. - [rust-lld-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/run-make/rust-lld-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu): Checks that LLD is used by default on `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` when the bootstrap `rust.lld` config option is `true`. - [rust-lld-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-dist](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1117bc1e6ce049495b0044dfe756afafc817d2d7/tests/run-make/rust-lld-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-dist): Dist test that checks that our distributed `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` archives actually use LLD by default. ## Ecosystem impact As already stated, LLD has been used as the default linker on x64 Linux on nightly for almost a year, and we haven't seen any blockers to stabilization in that time. There were a handful of issues reported, these are discussed later below. Furthermore, two crater runs ([November 2023](https://crater-reports.s3.amazonaws.com/pr-117684-2/index.html), [February 2025](https://crater-reports.s3.amazonaws.com/pr-137044-3/index.html)), were performed to test the impact of using LLD as the default linker. A triage of the earlier crater run was previously done [here](https://hackmd.io/OAJxlxc6Te6YUot9ftYSKQ), but all the important findings from both crater runs are reported below. Below is a list of compatibility differences between BFD and LLD that we have encountered. There is a more thorough list of differences in [this post](https://maskray.me/blog/2020-12-19-lld-and-gnu-linker-incompatibilities) from the current LLD maintainer. From that post, "99.9% pieces of software work with ld.lld without a change". --- ### `.ctors/.dtors` sections [#128286](#128286) reported an issue where LLD was unable to link certain CUDA library was using these sections that were using the `.ctors/.dtors` ELF sections. These were deprecated a long time ago (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46770), replaced with a more modern `.init_array/.fini_array` sections. LLD doesn't (and won't) support these sections ([1](llvm/llvm-project#68071), [2](llvm/llvm-project#30572)), so if they appear in input object files, the linked artifact might produce incorrect behavior, because e.g. some global variables might not get initialized properly. However, the usage of `.ctors/.dtors` should be very rare in practice. We have performed a [crater run](#137044) to test this. It has identified only 8 crates where the `.ctors/.dtors` section is occurring in the final linked artifact. It was caused by a few crates using the `.ctors` link section manually, and by using a very (~6 year) old version of the [ctor](https://crates.io/crates/ctor) crate. [Crater run analysis](https://hackmd.io/tFDifkUcSLGoHPBRIl0z8w?view#ctorsdtors-sections) **Possible workaround** It is possible to [detect](e5e2316) if `.ctors/.dtors` section is present in the final linked artifact (LLD will keep it there, but it won't be populated), and warn users about it. This check is very cheap and doesn't even appear on [perf](#112049 (comment)). We have benchmarked the check on a 240 MiB Chrome binary, where it took 0.8ms with page cache flushed, and 0.06ms with page cache primed (which should be the common case, as the linked artifact is written to disk just before the check is performed). In theory, this could be also solved with a linker script that moves `.ctors` to `.init_array`. We think that these sections should be so rare that it is not worth it to implement any workarounds for now. --- ### Different garbage collection behavior [#130397](#130397) reported an issue where LLD prunes a local symbol, so it is missing in the linked artifact. However, BFD keeps the same symbol, so it is a regression. This is caused by a difference in linker garbage collection. Rust uses `--gc-sections` and puts each function into a separate linker section, which prunes unused code. There is some code (specifically the somewhat popular [linkme](https://github.com/dtolnay/linkme) crate) that (arguably ab-)uses so called linker encapsulation symbols to achieve distributed slices. BFD (2.37+) uses a conservative linking mode that works as intended with this behavior, but it might slightly increase binary size of the linked artifact. LLD does not use this workaround by default, which causes the sections to be eliminated, but it can be made to use the conservative mode using [`-z nostart-stop-gc`](https://lld.llvm.org/ELF/start-stop-gc.html#z-start-stop-gc). To avoid this issue, we told LLD to use the [conservative mode](#137685), which maintains backwards compatibility with BFD. We found that it has [no effect](#112049 (comment)) on compilation performance and binary size in our benchmark suite. With this change, `linkme` works. Since then, #140872 removed `linkme` distributed slice's dependence on conservative GC behavior, so this PR also removes that conservative mode: no transition period is necessary, as the PR immediately fixed the crate with no source changes. [Crater run analysis](https://hackmd.io/tFDifkUcSLGoHPBRIl0z8w?view#Different-garbage-collection-behavior) --- ### Various uncommon issues A small number of issues that only occurred in a handful of instances were found in crater, and it is unclear if LLD is at fault or if there is some other issue that was not detected with BFD. You can examine these [here](https://hackmd.io/tFDifkUcSLGoHPBRIl0z8w?view#Various-uncommon-issues). --- ### Missing jobserver support LLD doesn't support the jobserver protocol for limiting the number of threads used, it simply defaults to using all available cores, and is one of the reasons why it's faster than BFD. However, this should mostly be a non-issue, because most of the linking done during high parallelism sections of `cargo build` is linking of build scripts and proc macros, which are typically very fast to link (e.g. ~50ms), and a potential oversubscription of cores thus doesn't hurt that much. When the final artifact is linked (which typically takes the most time), there should be no other sources of parallelism conflicts from compiling other code, so LLD should be able to use all available threads. That being said, it is a difference of behavior, where previously a `-j` flag was generally not using more cpu than the specified limit. It can be impactful in some resource-constrained systems, but to be clear that is already the case today due to [cargo parallelism](rust-lang/cargo#9157). This could be one reason to opt out of using `rust-lld` on some systems. LLD has support for limiting the number of threads to use, so in theory rustc could try to get all the jobserver tokens available and use that as lld's thread limit. It'd still be suboptimal as new tokens would not be dynamically detected, and we could be using less threads than available. We did a benchmark on a real-world crate that shows that using multiple LLD threads for intermediate artifacts doesn't seem to have a performance effect. You can find it [here](https://hackmd.io/tFDifkUcSLGoHPBRIl0z8w?view#Missing-jobserver-support). --- #### Opting out of LLD in the ecosystem We have also examined repositories where people opted out of LLD on nightly, using [this GitHub query](https://github.com/search?q=%22linker-features%3D-lld%22&type=code). The summary can be found below: <details> <summary>Summary of LLD opt outs</summary> > This examination was performed on 2025-03-09. Here we briefly examine the most common reasons why people use `-Zlinker-features=-lld`, based on comments and git history. - Nix/NixOS ([1](https://github.com/rszyma/vscode-kanata/blob/59d703dff5a238b14ab3759cac27f73fb34bbcfe/flake.nix#L33), [2](https://github.com/sbernauer/breakwater/blob/3cc3449fc126c5c99d4a971733fd32be589884e0/.cargo/config.toml#L4), [3](https://github.com/tiiuae/ebpf-firewall/blame/32bdb17cedd1c9bea1ab3482623de458d95da7d0/.cargo/config.toml#L2), [4](https://github.com/jules-sommer/wavetheme-gen/blob/f5f657d014d4a30607625afb70f810c229c0294e/Cargo.toml#L4), [5](https://github.com/LayerTwo-Labs/zside-rust/blob/e4266f5c5571a1b180a9c70cf0939c7070e410c7/.cargo/config.toml#L10), [6](https://github.com/przyjacielpkp/zkml/blob/22a4aef24e9d2c77789229d7c634fc67e9eb1184/README.md?plain=1#L78), [7](https://github.com/LayerTwo-Labs/thunder-rust/blob/2222d53474c8d2d0428b4c56f8157095dced6d5a/.cargo/config.toml#L2), [8](https://github.com/enesoztrk/nixos-tc-aya-test/blob/b2ffa59d3eba8b60fd04b0a4c8bbe047400eb981/.cargo/config.toml#L4), [9](https://github.com/lowRISC/container-hotplug/blob/3ead4ef9c7f79c303392178c99677dbecff1aea6/.cargo/config.toml#L2), [10](https://github.com/Eliah-Lakhin/ad-astra/blob/ca6b8c8a5dba7bb5e894f3f1013f17876962a021/work/examples/lsp-client/src/extension.ts#L94)) - There was an [issue](NixOS/nixpkgs#312661) with LLD, which seems to have been fixed with NixOS/nixpkgs#314268. It's unclear whether that fixed all the Nix issues though. - Issues with linkme ([1](https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/zk_evm/blob/ef388619ffbd5305209519a3a5bc0396185d68ac/.cargo/config.toml#L4), [2](https://github.com/conjure-cp/conjure-oxide/blob/be0fc5827ff90e8486d416cc184b6ce24f73bf01/README.md?plain=1#L20), [3](https://github.com/clchiou/garage/blob/c5d8444d56bb6ee24ca95e5c6b9880ed996f4918/rust/.cargo/config.toml#L6), [4](https://github.com/PonasKovas/craftflow/blob/5b4cc1a5196e08a975368399fefda4b71f3a2f6f/.cargo/config.toml#L3), [5](https://github.com/kezhuw/zookeeper-client-rust/blob/4e27c7de2a7cc5e709af012b791c8fea9bb47f1f/.github/workflows/ci.yml#L82), [6](https://github.com/niklasdewally/conjure-oxide/blob/8fe60c12bca7011a2f9eded4b7c95ad0e77b6f44/.github/workflows/code-coverage.yml#L48), [7](https://github.com/kezhuw/spawns/blob/c8b468379805de9df3287c01b94b4ed3db6b61ed/.github/workflows/ci.yml#L74)) - These should be resolved with the conservative garbage collection ([#137685](#137685)). - Bazel ([1](https://github.com/google-parfait/confidential-federated-compute/blob/1823f69ed8f5f4f819f7bfa21da1ca629fdc826b/.bazelrc#L71)), WASM ([1](https://github.com/Eliah-Lakhin/ad-astra/blob/ca6b8c8a5dba7bb5e894f3f1013f17876962a021/work/examples/wasm-build.sh#L37), [2](https://github.com/yacineb/pgrx-wasi-test/blob/2bf99037ca1b650b2cbc35f1257a87fb6ead0920/build.sh#L21)), uncategorized ([2](https://github.com/nbdd0121/r2vm/blob/5118be6b9e757c6fef2f019385873f403c23c548/.cargo/config.toml#L3), [3](https://github.com/Wyvern/Img/blame/45020c7e1dc4926c8129647014c708db0c13f463/.cargo/config.toml#L209), [4](https://github.com/arnaudpoullet/leptos-i18n-compile-error/blob/042eb835f7ca0dc36be67cf7fe65b35b22b6059f/README.md?plain=1#L89), [5](https://github.com/JonLeeCon/numerical-rust-cpu/blob/fd0b3006768ed81c56147044dc05c92b11b7b6f0/exercises/.cargo/config.toml#L13), [6](https://github.com/PonasKovas/shallowclone/blob/be65f2ec923cac6ceedbc8db520c89969ebfce7c/.github/workflows/rust.yml#L20)) - Reason unclear. </details> ## History The idea to use a faster linker by default has been on the radar for quite some time ([#39915](#39915), [#71515](#71515)). There were [very early attempts](#29974) to use the gold linker by default, but these had to be [reverted](#30913) because of compatibility issues. Support for LLD was implemented back in [2017](#40018), but it has not been made default yet, except for some more niche targets, such as [WASM](#48125), [ARM Cortex](#53648) or [RISC-V](#53822). It took quite some time to figure out how should the interface for selecting the linker (and the way it is invoked) look like, as it differs a lot between different platforms, linkers and compiler drivers. During that time, LLD has matured and achieved [almost perfect compatibility](https://maskray.me/blog/2020-12-19-lld-and-gnu-linker-incompatibilities) with the default Linux linker (BFD). - [#56351](#56351) stabilized `-Clinker-flavor`, which is used to determine how to invoke the linker. It is especially useful on targets where selecting the linker directly with `-Clinker` is not possible or is impractical. - December 2018, author `@davidtwco,` reviewer `@nagisa` - [#76158](#76158) stabilized `-Clink-self-contained=[y|n]`, which allows overriding the compiler's heuristic for deciding whether it should use self-contained or external tools (linker, sanitizers, libc, etc.). It only allowed using the self-contained mode either for everything (`y`) or nothing (`n`), but did not allow granular choice. - September 2020, author `@mati864,` reviewer `@petrochenkov` - [#85961](#85961) implemented the `-Zgcc-ld` flag, which was a hacky way of opting into LLD usage. - June 2021, author `@sledgehammervampire,` reviewer `@petrochenkov` - [MCP 510](rust-lang/compiler-team#510) proposed stabilizing the behavior of `-Zgcc-ld` using more granular flags (`-Clink-self-contained=linker -Clinker-flavor=gcc-lld`). - Initially implemented in [#96827](#96827), but `@petrochenkov` [suggested](#96827 (comment)) a slightly different approach. - The PR was split into [#96884](#96884), where it was decided what will be the individual components of `-Clink-self-contained=linker`. - And [#96401](#96401), which implemented the `-Clinker-flavor` part. - The MCP was finally implemented in [#112910](#112910). - [#116514](#116514) then removed `-Zgcc-ld`, as it was replaced by `-Clinker-flavor=gnu-lld-cc` + `-Clink-self-contained=linker`. - April 2022 - October 2023, author `@lqd,` reviewer `@petrochenkov` - Various linker handling refactorings were performed in the meantime: [#97375](#97375), [#98212](#98212), [#100126](#100126), [#100552](#100552), [#102836](#102836), [#110807](#110807), [#101988](#101988), [#116515](#116515) - The implementation of linker flavors with LLD was causing a sort of a combinatorial explosion of various options. [#119906](#119906) suggested a different approach for linker flavors (described [here](#119906 (comment))), where the individual flavors could be enabled separately using `+/-` (e.g. `+lld`). - After some back and forth, this idea was moved to `-Clinker-features` (see [comment 1](#119906 (comment)) and [comment 2](#119906 (comment))), which was implemented in [#123656](#123656). - April 2024, author `@lqd,` reviewer `@petrochenkov` - [#124129](#124129) enabled LLD by default on nightly. - April 2024, author `@lqd,` reviewer `@petrochenkov` - [#137685](#137685), [#137926](#137926) enabled the conservative gargage collection mode (`-znostart-stop-gc`) to improve compatibility with BFD. - February 2025, author `@lqd,` reviewer `@petrochenkov` (implementation), author `@kobzol,` reviewer `@lqd` (test) - [#96025](#96025) (April 2022), [#117684](#117684) (November 2023), [#137044](#137044) (February 2025): crater runs. ## Unresolved questions/concerns - Is changing the linker considered a breaking change? In (hopefully very rare) cases, it might break some existing code. It should mostly only affect the final linked artifact, so it should be easy to opt out. - Similarly, is the single-threaded behavior of such tools encompassed in our stability guarantee: it can be observed via the `-j` job limit (though I believe we have/had some open issues on sometimes using more CPU resources than the job count limit implied). As mentioned above, LLD does not support the jobserver protocol. - A concern [was raised](#71515 (comment)) about increased memory usage of LLD. We should probably let users know about the possibly increased memory usage, and jobserver incompatibility: we did so when announcing this landing on nightly. - LLD seems to produce [slightly larger](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=b3e117044c7f707293edc040edb93e7ec5f7040a&end=baed03c51a68376c1789cc373581eea0daf89967&stat=size%3Alinked_artifact&tab=compile) binary artifacts. This can be partially clawed back using Identical Code Folding (`-Clink-args=-Wl,--icf=all`). - Should we detect the outdated `.ctors/.dtors` sections to provide a better error message, even if that should be rare in practice? --- ### Next steps After the FCP completes: - we should land this PR at the beginning of a beta cycle, to maximize time for testing - keep an eye on the beta crater run results for possible linker issues (or do a dedicated beta crater run with only this change) - release a blog post announcing the change, and asking for testing feedback of the appropriate beta - depending on feedback, or if a period of testing of 6 weeks is not long enough, we could keep this change on beta for another cycle --- Development, testing, try builds were done in #138645. r? `@petrochenkov` `@rustbot` label +needs-fcp +T-compiler
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TODO: detailed description.
Features that may affect the naming scheme for linker flavors (at least those I'm aware of):
--target, something that is not supported by gcc-style compilers.LinkerFlavor::Gnufor aLinkerFlavor::Msvc-based target - rustc_target: support Unix-flavor linkers for UEFI #110869. Even if it requires some special logic, that would still be less heavy weight than providing whole separate targets with their own CI and distributed binaries.r? @lqd
cc @jschwe