Skip to content

Parse grammar without regexes #1827

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

traviscross
Copy link
Contributor

@traviscross traviscross commented May 16, 2025

We'd been parsing the grammar with a combination of recursive descent and regular expression matchers. This combination has its merits, and it's done tastefully here, but it seems maybe more straightforward to do the parsing entirely with recursive descent. Among other things, doing it this way allows us to provide more precise error reporting on malformed inputs.

The cost, in terms of lines of code, of doing this is rather modest, and the result seems at least as clear -- there's some mental cost to code switching between the two worlds. So let's make the switch and parse the grammar without regular expressions.

We verified that the rendered output of the Reference is byte identical before and after this change.

cc @ehuss

@traviscross traviscross force-pushed the TC/parse-without-regex branch 2 times, most recently from 9525e43 to 2786fb4 Compare May 16, 2025 07:15
}

fn parse_charset(&mut self) -> Result<ExpressionKind> {
self.expect("[", "expected opening [")?;
let mut characters = Vec::new();
loop {
self.space0();
let Some(ch) = self.parse_characters() else {
let Some(ch) = self.parse_characters()? else {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We now notice and report errors when parsing the elements of a character class.

self.index = recov + 1;
bail!(self, "invalid start terminal in range");
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We recover the parser index before reporting errors so as to put the arrow in the correct place.

Comment on lines -348 to +365
static UNICODE_RE: LazyLock<Regex> = LazyLock::new(|| Regex::new(r"^[A-Z0-9]{4}").unwrap());

match self.take_re(&UNICODE_RE) {
Some(s) => Ok(ExpressionKind::Unicode(s[0].to_string())),
None => bail!(self, "expected 4 hexadecimal uppercase digits after U+"),
let mut xs = Vec::with_capacity(4);
for _ in 0..4 {
match self.peek() {
Some(x @ (b'0'..=b'9' | b'A'..=b'F')) => {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The old code was accepting A-Z in a hex digit. We narrow this down to A-F.

match self.take_re(&FOOTNOTE_RE) {
Some(cap) => Ok(Some(cap[1].to_string())),
None => bail!(self, "unterminated footnote, expected closing `]`"),
let id = self.take_while(&|x| !['\n', ']'].contains(&x)).to_string();
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Really I'd prefer this to_string call to happen at the bottom, but alas, this is one of those borrow checker limitations.

static PROSE_RE: LazyLock<Regex> = LazyLock::new(|| Regex::new(r"^<([^>\n]+)>").unwrap());
match self.take_re(&PROSE_RE) {
Some(cap) => Ok(ExpressionKind::Prose(cap[1].to_string())),
None => bail!(self, "unterminated prose, expected closing `>`"),
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here and elsewhere, we were incorrectly reporting things being unterminated when they were actually empty. This is now fixed.

@traviscross traviscross marked this pull request as ready for review May 16, 2025 07:22
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: The marked PR is awaiting review from a maintainer label May 16, 2025
We'd been parsing the grammar with a combination of recursive descent
and regular expression matchers.  This combination has its merits, and
it's done tastefully here, but it seems maybe more straightforward to
do the parsing entirely with recursive descent.  Among other things,
doing it this way allows us to provide more precise error reporting on
malformed inputs.

The cost, in terms of lines of code, of doing this is rather modest,
and the result seems at least as clear -- there's some mental cost to
code switching between the two worlds.  So let's make the switch and
parse the grammar without regular expressions.

We verified that the rendered output of the Reference is byte
identical before and after this change.
@traviscross traviscross force-pushed the TC/parse-without-regex branch from 2786fb4 to 1a7304b Compare May 16, 2025 07:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: The marked PR is awaiting review from a maintainer
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants