-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 550
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
many changes to edge_{velocity,acceleration,jerk} #112
base: melodic-devel
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
I'm adding too much stuff on these hpp files, and most part of them are the same when get acceleration, we have to calculate velocity twice (and another three times if we want jerk optimization) there is something not right |
so far this code is work, but not good... |
another question: should we use normalized velocity/acceleration? |
yet another question: why use |
fix acceleration bug tweak comment change file mode tweak default parameters
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello, thank you for your excellent work. I would like to know if this change can be used for non-holonomic robots.
This hasn't been discussed for quite some time, but I'm curious as to why the jerk isn't being applied to Tebs. |
fix #89 for different types of holonomic robot
changes:
max_vel_x_backwards
support)omni_type
for different holonomic typesinclude/teb_local_planner/g2o_types/
tosrc/g2o_types
exact_arc_length
support to holonomic robots{weight_,}_jerk_lim_{x,y,theta}
options{weight_,}_{acc,jerk}_lim_{x,y,theta}
valueThis PR was (partly) used in Jingdong Robotics Challenge 2018