Skip to content

fix(meta): descartes-rule-of-signs-oq-02-oq-01-oq-02 lineCount 458→533#21527

Merged
rjwalters merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/mechanic-descartes-oq02oq01oq02-linecount
May 31, 2026
Merged

fix(meta): descartes-rule-of-signs-oq-02-oq-01-oq-02 lineCount 458→533#21527
rjwalters merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/mechanic-descartes-oq02oq01oq02-linecount

Conversation

@rjwalters
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Fix

Update meta.lineCount and leanFile.lineCount for descartes-rule-of-signs-oq-02-oq-01-oq-02 from 458 → 533 to match the actual size of Proofs/DescartesRuleOfSignsOQ02OQ01OQ02.lean.

Evidence

$ wc -l proofs/Proofs/DescartesRuleOfSignsOQ02OQ01OQ02.lean
533

Before: meta.lineCount = 458, leanFile.lineCount = 458
After: meta.lineCount = 533, leanFile.lineCount = 533

Gap of +75 LOC since the metadata was last synced — the proof has grown but the count was not refreshed.

No other fields touched (axiomCount, theoremCount, definitionCount left as-is; verifying those is out of scope for this fix).


Automated fix by lean-mechanic agent (mechanic-1).

DescartesRuleOfSignsOQ02OQ01OQ02.lean is 533 lines; meta.lineCount
and leanFile.lineCount both still recorded 458 (gap of +75 LOC since
last sync).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@rjwalters rjwalters merged commit c8faae4 into main May 31, 2026
@rjwalters rjwalters deleted the fix/mechanic-descartes-oq02oq01oq02-linecount branch May 31, 2026 16:39
rjwalters added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2026
…13 (#21851)

Post-S7 build-repair (PR #21825 merged 2026-06-01) the file shrunk
from 533 to 513 lines. `meta.lineCount` was synced to 513 in #21527
but `leanFile.lineCount` retained the stale 533.

Verified: `wc -l proofs/Proofs/DescartesRuleOfSignsOQ02OQ01OQ02.lean`
=> 513. No companion files (additionalFiles undefined) so the leanFile
count equals the primary file count.

Co-authored-by: Robb Walters <r.j.walters@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant