Add ssh check to check_nova-instance.py #49
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| timer = 0 | ||
| start = totimestamp() | ||
| ssh_status = '' | ||
| test_host = self.instance.networks.itervalues().next()[0], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wonder if this is the private IP and if yes, how can you reach it?
Are you using nova-network?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, this is the private IP. Yes, I am using nova-network. If we add fixed IP association to VM provisioning, we can optionally use that. The current incarnation works for my purposes.
sileht
force-pushed
the
master
branch
3 times, most recently
from
d61eaf9 to
b299ce3
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit enhances check_nova-instance.py with an optional additional check and fixes some proofreading items in the whole script.
self.instance.networks.itervalues().next().Apologies for lack of granularity, I wasn't tracking the file when I made changes. This should really be two commits.