-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 236
perf: uninstall classnames, install clsx #583
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@li-jia-nan has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 15 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. Walkthrough本次变更将依赖库从 classnames 切换为 clsx,并在相关源码中替换对应的导入与调用;同时在 .gitignore 中新增忽略 pnpm-lock.yaml。未涉及公开 API、控制流或行为变更。 Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (简单) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @li-jia-nan, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on a performance enhancement by migrating the project's utility for conditionally joining CSS class names from the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.
|
Warning Review the following alerts detected in dependencies. According to your organization's Security Policy, it is recommended to resolve "Warn" alerts. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #583 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 96.41% 96.41%
=======================================
Files 17 17
Lines 948 948
Branches 278 274 -4
=======================================
Hits 914 914
Misses 34 34 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request successfully replaces the classnames
library with clsx
for performance benefits. The migration is done correctly across the codebase. I've suggested a minor improvement to the import style for clsx
to align with its documentation and common usage patterns, which will enhance code consistency and maintainability. Overall, this is a good change that improves the project's performance footprint.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
.gitignore
(1 hunks)package.json
(1 hunks)src/Popup/Arrow.tsx
(2 hunks)src/Popup/Mask.tsx
(2 hunks)src/Popup/index.tsx
(2 hunks)src/index.tsx
(3 hunks)
Summary by CodeRabbit