update int

[thedavidmeister]

Motivation

Solution

Checks

By submitting this for review, I'm confirming I've done the following:

• made this PR as small as possible
• unit-tested any new functionality
• linked any relevant issues or PRs
• included screenshots (if this involves a front-end change)

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated an internal submodule reference to the latest version to keep dependencies in sync. No changes to features, behavior, or performance are expected for end-users.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Updated the submodule reference for lib/rain.interpreter.interface from commit 456c2365… to f777a1c7…. No other files changed and no code within this repository was modified.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Submodule reference update lib/rain.interpreter.interface	Advanced submodule pointer from 456c2365… to f777a1c7…

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• 2025 10 04 i9r int #410 — Previously updated the same submodule pointer to 456c236…, and this PR advances it from that commit to f777a1c7….
• bump int #405 — Updates the lib/rain.interpreter.interface submodule pointer as well.
• bump up rain.interpreter.interface #363 — Also bumps the lib/rain.interpreter.interface submodule reference.

Suggested reviewers

• hardyjosh
• findolor

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title Check	❓ Inconclusive	The title “update int” is too vague and does not clearly describe that the pull request simply advances the rain.interpreter.interface submodule pointer, so it fails to convey the main change.	Please revise the title to clearly reflect the change, for example “Bump rain.interpreter.interface submodule to commit f777a1c7” or “Update interpreter interface submodule pointer.”

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch 2025-10-10-int

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6068857 and 596da44.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• foundry.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• lib/rain.interpreter.interface (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (10)

• GitHub Check: rainix (ubuntu-latest, test-wasm-build)
• GitHub Check: rainix (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-artifacts)
• GitHub Check: rainix (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-static)
• GitHub Check: rainix (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-test)
• GitHub Check: rainix (ubuntu-latest, rainix-rs-static)
• GitHub Check: rainix (ubuntu-latest, rainix-rs-test)
• GitHub Check: rainix (macos-latest, rainix-rs-artifacts)
• GitHub Check: rainix (ubuntu-latest, rainix-rs-artifacts)
• GitHub Check: rainix (macos-latest, rainix-rs-test)
• GitHub Check: git-clean

🔇 Additional comments (1)

lib/rain.interpreter.interface (1)

1-1: Need context before approving the submodule bump.

Please summarize what changed in lib/rain.interpreter.interface at commit f777a1c7…, note any breaking/behavioral differences vs. 456c2365…, and confirm the relevant tests (unit/integration) pass against that revision.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

@coderabbitai assess this PR size classification for the totality of the PR with the following criterias and report it in your comment:

S/M/L PR Classification Guidelines:

This guide helps classify merged pull requests by effort and complexity rather than just line count. The goal is to assess the difficulty and scope of changes after they have been completed.

Small (S)

Characteristics:

• Simple bug fixes, typos, or minor refactoring
• Single-purpose changes affecting 1-2 files
• Documentation updates
• Configuration tweaks
• Changes that require minimal context to review

Review Effort: Would have taken 5-10 minutes

Examples:

• Fix typo in variable name
• Update README with new instructions
• Adjust configuration values
• Simple one-line bug fixes
• Import statement cleanup

Medium (M)

Characteristics:

• Feature additions or enhancements
• Refactoring that touches multiple files but maintains existing behavior
• Breaking changes with backward compatibility
• Changes requiring some domain knowledge to review

Review Effort: Would have taken 15-30 minutes

Examples:

• Add new feature or component
• Refactor common utility functions
• Update dependencies with minor breaking changes
• Add new component with tests
• Performance optimizations
• More complex bug fixes

Large (L)

Characteristics:

• Major feature implementations
• Breaking changes or API redesigns
• Complex refactoring across multiple modules
• New architectural patterns or significant design changes
• Changes requiring deep context and multiple review rounds

Review Effort: Would have taken 45+ minutes

Examples:

• Complete new feature with frontend/backend changes
• Protocol upgrades or breaking changes
• Major architectural refactoring
• Framework or technology upgrades

Additional Factors to Consider

When deciding between sizes, also consider:

• Test coverage impact: More comprehensive test changes lean toward larger classification
• Risk level: Changes to critical systems bump up a size category
• Team familiarity: Novel patterns or technologies increase complexity

Notes:

• the assessment must be for the totality of the PR, that means comparing the base branch to the last commit of the PR
• the assessment output must be exactly one of: S, M or L (single-line comment) in format of: SIZE={S/M/L}
• do not include any additional text, only the size classification
• your assessment comment must not include tips or additional sections
• do NOT tag me or anyone else on your comment

[coderabbitai]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the full diff of the PR to verify it's just a submodule update
gh pr diff 412 --repo rainlanguage/rain.interpreter

Length of output: 685

---

SIZE=S