Skip to content

Bump rain-solmem 0.1.3 -> 0.1.26 - #59

Merged
thedavidmeister merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
2026-08-19-solmem-0.1.26
Aug 19, 2026
Merged

Bump rain-solmem 0.1.3 -> 0.1.26#59
thedavidmeister merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
2026-08-19-solmem-0.1.26

Conversation

@thedavidmeister

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Clears the roh dash's stale-dep flag on this repo (rain-solmem pinned 0.1.3, latest 0.1.26).

  • foundry.toml: rain-solmem 0.1.3 -> 0.1.26
  • remappings.txt and the three version-pinned import sites (LibPointer, LibMemCpy, LibBytes) updated to match
  • soldeer.lock regenerated via forge soldeer update

Same shape as rain.extrospection PR #134 this morning. The consumed solmem APIs are unchanged between the versions (0.1.4–0.1.26 changes are NatSpec plus a new truncation error). Local run: 23 passed, 0 failed.

QA

  • Discriminating tests: n/a - dependency version bump with no first-party logic change; the discriminator is the existing 23-test suite passing against the new dependency (verified locally, full suite, 1024-run fuzz)
  • Mutations applied: n/a - no first-party source logic changed; the only source edits are version-pinned import path strings and the remapping, whose mutation is a compile error by construction
  • Oracle: the existing test suite, whose expected values predate this change and are independent of the bumped dependency; solmem 0.1.3->0.1.26 diff reviewed for API stability of the consumed libs
  • Category check: dash stale-dep flag asks for the solmem pin to reach latest; covered: dependency pin, remappings, import paths, lockfile - the full surface a soldeer bump touches in this org's version-pinned-import convention

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Version-pinned import paths and remappings updated alongside the
dependency pin; soldeer.lock regenerated. Full suite passes locally
(23 tests).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@thedavidmeister, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 25 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits within each organization.

For paid Pro and Pro+ reviews, CodeRabbit uses a developer's included PR review attempts over the past 7 days to set the current hourly allowance. At typical activity levels, the full plan allowance applies. Higher sustained activity can lower the allowance until earlier attempts leave the 7-day window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: fc18ccbe-052a-4d71-8e05-887c61572f17

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 01e329a and 3b44a31.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • soldeer.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • foundry.toml
  • remappings.txt
  • src/lib/LibDataContract.sol
  • test/lib/LibDataContract.t.sol

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@thedavidmeister
thedavidmeister merged commit ab7f683 into main Aug 19, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant