Skip to content

docs(q6a): correct UFS module performance data#1481

Closed
tangzz-radxa wants to merge 2 commits into
radxa-docs:mainfrom
tangzz-radxa:fix/q6a-ufs-perf-correct-data
Closed

docs(q6a): correct UFS module performance data#1481
tangzz-radxa wants to merge 2 commits into
radxa-docs:mainfrom
tangzz-radxa:fix/q6a-ufs-perf-correct-data

Conversation

@tangzz-radxa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes incorrect UFS performance data from PR #1480.

Changes:

  • Replace the two-row table (Samsung 128GB swap-test data, Kioxia 256GB internal data) with a single accurate row
  • Radxa UFS Module 128GB on Q6A: 1703 MB/s read, 388 MB/s write
  • Remove UFS chip brand/model column (not relevant for end users)
  • Remove 256GB Kioxia data (internal reference, not for public docs)

Supersedes: #1480

@tangzz-radxa tangzz-radxa requested a review from a team as a code owner March 17, 2026 08:17
- Radxa UFS Module 128GB: 1703 MB/s read, 388 MB/s write
- Radxa UFS Module 256GB: 1811 MB/s read, 557 MB/s write
- Remove UFS chip brand/model column (not relevant for end users)
- Supersedes PR radxa-docs#1480 which had incorrect data attribution
@tangzz-radxa tangzz-radxa force-pushed the fix/q6a-ufs-perf-correct-data branch from 1bd5bfb to b597d13 Compare March 17, 2026 08:30
@xzl01 xzl01 closed this Mar 17, 2026
@xzl01 xzl01 reopened this Mar 17, 2026
@xzl01
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

xzl01 commented Mar 17, 2026

你需要先rebase 然后再进行修改

@jack-ma
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

jack-ma commented Mar 17, 2026

@tangzz-radxa 请拉取最新的 docs 文档再重新提 PR

@xzl01
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

xzl01 commented Mar 18, 2026

经过 rebase 分析,main 分支已经包含了更详细的 UFS 性能数据(含颗粒品牌/型号信息),此 PR 的改动反而会覆盖 main 上更好的版本。建议关闭此 PR。

@xzl01 xzl01 closed this Mar 18, 2026
@xzl01 xzl01 reopened this Apr 16, 2026
# Conflicts:
#	docs/dragon/q6a/hardware-use/ufs-emmc-com.md
#	i18n/en/docusaurus-plugin-content-docs/current/dragon/q6a/hardware-use/ufs-emmc-com.md
@xzl01 xzl01 closed this Apr 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants