-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 287
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handle URLs from GitHub Enterprise managed orgs #2098
Open
jameslairdsmith
wants to merge
1
commit into
r-lib:main
Choose a base branch
from
jameslairdsmith:gh-api-url
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you have any concrete info on how universally this applies to GHE? Like, is this scheme for the hostname forced on you or is it a default or recommended? I've long wanted to better account for GHE and dragged my feet due to my perception that this could be anything.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For example, in #1897, the host is
ghe-gsk-prod.metworx.com
. So I am inclined to believe that full GHE support will need to make this configurable.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't stand-up the environment, so I can't be 100% certain, but my understanding is the following.
github_remote_list()
not picking up GHE host #1897 above).To confirm item (2) above, you can have a look at this page in the GitHub API documentation which says the following in the first section:
If that's true, then you are correct in that the changes in this PR don't amount to full GHE support, because they don't account for self-hosted GitHub Enterprise server. And I agree that the only way to properly account for it would be to make it configurable. But it does feel to me like "ghe.com" is standard enough that it would be nice to account for it automatically without users having to set their own environment variable. Allowing a configurable override would of course be a sensible next step.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the extra info! So I gather that you have GitHub Enterprise Cloud? It does seems like accomodating that would be considerably easier than full configurability. I'm about to be travelling, but I'll come back and review this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's correct yes.
Safe travels! And thanks for the prompt response!