Skip to content

Exporting start_time in InstructionEvent to Inspector (#10295) #10344

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2025

Conversation

Gasoonjia
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:

ETDump profiled data does not include start_time information when Inspector analyzes Events. Although InstructionEvent's ProfileEvent member contains start_time and end_time information, they are used to only elpased_time which is exposed to Inspect. However, without the information, we are unable to visualize the time-series view of operator executions. This diff is to expose the start_time to Inspector so that it can access the start_time information.

A resulting visualization example with start_time

{F1977252760}

Differential Revision: D72740782

Summary:

ETDump profiled data does not include start_time information when Inspector analyzes Events. Although InstructionEvent's ProfileEvent member contains start_time and end_time information, they are used to only elpased_time which is exposed to Inspect. However, without the information, we are unable to visualize the time-series view of operator executions. This diff is to expose the start_time to Inspector so that it can access the start_time information.

#### A resulting visualization example with start_time
 {F1977252760}

Differential Revision: D72740782
@Gasoonjia Gasoonjia requested a review from tarun292 as a code owner April 21, 2025 23:55
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 21, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10344

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure

As of commit 7790e92 with merge base 7c150d4 (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

  • pull / unittest-arm / linux-job (gh)
    RuntimeError: Command docker exec -t e381a4f70e5710b9ad424f0dd8dc691b4b170a0c9fd3dc105d8d87bd8d0bda24 /exec failed with exit code 1

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Apr 21, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D72740782

@Gasoonjia
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

@juyoung-meta
Copy link

LGTM

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot merged commit 095722b into pytorch:main Apr 22, 2025
84 of 89 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported topic: not user facing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants