Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix missing __dict__ #2685

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2025
Merged

Conversation

sbrunner
Copy link
Contributor

Type of Changes

Type
🐛 Bug fix

Description

No crash when the object didn't have an attribute __dict__

Refs pylint-dev/pylint#10223

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.19%. Comparing base (fe893d9) to head (b912202).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2685   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.19%   93.19%           
=======================================
  Files          93       93           
  Lines       11066    11069    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits        10313    10316    +3     
  Misses        753      753           
Flag Coverage Δ
linux 93.08% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
pypy 93.19% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
windows 93.19% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
astroid/raw_building.py 94.58% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️

Copy link
Collaborator

@DanielNoord DanielNoord left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mind adding a test for this?

Possibly by calling del on something with a __dict__ attribute.

@sbrunner sbrunner force-pushed the missing-dict branch 4 times, most recently from 199ce1c to ce259c0 Compare February 18, 2025 09:58
@sbrunner
Copy link
Contributor Author

I just added a test but with the mypy exception because it's not possible to delete the dict attribute on an exception!

Copy link
Member

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM thank you for opening the issue and following up @sbrunner !

Copy link
Collaborator

@DanielNoord DanielNoord left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@sbrunner
Copy link
Contributor Author

When is it planned to be merged and released?

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas merged commit eed7458 into pylint-dev:main Feb 24, 2025
20 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

The backport to maintenance/3.3.x failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 1

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add .worktrees/backport-maintenance/3.3.x maintenance/3.3.x
# Navigate to the new working tree
cd .worktrees/backport-maintenance/3.3.x
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport-2685-to-maintenance/3.3.x
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 eed745859f1242e300de597e5050433e62adcbfe
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport-2685-to-maintenance/3.3.x
# Go back to the original working tree
cd ../..
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove .worktrees/backport-maintenance/3.3.x

Then, create a pull request where the base branch is maintenance/3.3.x and the compare/head branch is backport-2685-to-maintenance/3.3.x.

@Pierre-Sassoulas
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the reminder @sbrunner ! We'll backport and release in the next patch version

@sbrunner
Copy link
Contributor Author

Excellent, thanks @Pierre-Sassoulas :-)

@Pierre-Sassoulas
Copy link
Member

Maybe only in 4.0.0 as the cherry-pick is a little tricky #2690 .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants