Skip to content

Remove redundant edittext_login_id#26

Open
oja wants to merge 1 commit intoproject-manatee:grade-projectionfrom
oja:grade-projection
Open

Remove redundant edittext_login_id#26
oja wants to merge 1 commit intoproject-manatee:grade-projectionfrom
oja:grade-projection

Conversation

@oja
Copy link
Contributor

@oja oja commented Apr 16, 2017

The value of edittext_login_id can be calculated from the value of edittext_login_username, so it is not needed.

@oja oja changed the title Remove redundant edittext_login_id Remove redundant edittext_login_id Apr 16, 2017
@ehsanmasdar
Copy link
Member

Student id is used to select a student for multi student parent accounts, which could not be parsed in this way

@patil215
Copy link
Member

patil215 commented Apr 17, 2017

Yep, what @ehsanmasdar said is accurate. Unless TEAMS has changed, you can't do what this pull request is suggesting, since there are certain accounts where there are multiple student IDs tied to one username.

If you really want to remove the student ID box, one option is to have an additional spinner style selection prompt pop up if the parser detects multiple student IDs in the account when logging in.

@oja
Copy link
Contributor Author

oja commented Apr 17, 2017

I've seen a couple of students get confused about providing the same information twice on login, so I think its probably best to remove the third box.

In order to cover the case of multistudent accounts @ehsanmasdar brought up: maybe there could be a prompt for that information after clicking the login button (similar to the existing "secondary login" one)? Or do you think the whole thing should be left as-is?

@patil215
Copy link
Member

Yep, the secondary prompt is exactly what I suggested above - I think that'd definitely be a great improvement over the current implementation.

@oja
Copy link
Contributor Author

oja commented Apr 17, 2017

Sorry, didn't see your edit to that comment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants