-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
Turn debug assertions into CBMC constraints when CBMC is used #666
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ce87d46
to
27519b4
Compare
hanno-becker
commented
Jan 17, 2025
hanno-becker
commented
Jan 17, 2025
mkannwischer
requested changes
Jan 17, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are still some >= 0
loop invariants in here. Those will have to be removed when this is rebased on #664.
8ce0b89
to
998281f
Compare
Signed-off-by: Hanno Becker <[email protected]>
Previously, runtime assertions via debug_assert_xxx and CBMC assertions via cassert(...) were separate. This commit modifies the implementation of the debug assertion macros so that when CBMC is used, debug assertions are intepreted as proof obligations. This removes some redundancy and non-uniformity in the code, and also reduces the likelihood that debug assertions and CBMC contracts get out of sync. In some case, this actually happened, and the commit fixes this. The commit also adds further bounds assertions in alignment with pre/post conditions. A slight nuisance is that the debug assertions cannot flatten nested structures like polyvec for the bounds check, running into issue diffblue/cbmc#8570. We work around this by introducing a new `xxx_2d` (for 2-dimensional) macro which takes two dimensions and uses a two-step array access, circumventing the above CBMC issue. Signed-off-by: Hanno Becker <[email protected]>
998281f
to
79757a2
Compare
mkannwischer
approved these changes
Jan 17, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the changes!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, runtime assertions via debug_assert_xxx and CBMC
assertions via cassert(...) were separate.
This commit modifies the implementation of the debug assertion
macros so that when CBMC is used, debug assertions are intepreted
as proof obligations.
This removes some redundancy and non-uniformity in the code,
and also reduces the likelihood that debug assertions and CBMC
contracts get out of sync. In some case, this actually happened,
and the commit fixes this. The commit also adds further bounds
assertions in alignment with pre/post conditions.
A slight nuisance is that the debug assertions cannot flatten
nested structures like polyvec for the bounds check, running
into issue diffblue/cbmc#8570. We
work around this by introducing a new
xxx_2d
(for 2-dimensional)macro which takes two dimensions and uses a two-step array
access, circumventing the above CBMC issue.