Open
Conversation
lymereJ
requested review from
Fan-Feng,
jslane-h,
leijerry888,
yanchenpnnl and
yunjoonjung-PNNL
yunjoonjung-PNNL
approved these changes
Apr 26, 2024
Collaborator
yunjoonjung-PNNL
left a comment
yunjoonjung-PNNL
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks great! Thank you for this effort Jeremy!
jslane-h
reviewed
Apr 26, 2024
leijerry888
approved these changes
May 28, 2024
Collaborator
leijerry888
left a comment
leijerry888
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@lymereJ Thanks for the great work and the discussion. I just added my revision based on our discussion. Please take a look and see if the changes make sense to you. Thanks!
lymereJ
commented
May 28, 2024
docs/paper.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| Advances in building control have shown significant potential for improving building energy performance and decarbonization. Studies show that designs utilizing optimized controls that are properly tuned could cut commercial building energy consumption by approximately 29% - equivalent to 4-5 Quads, or 4-5% of the energy consumed in the United States [@impa_ctrl]. Driven by the significant control-related energy-saving potential, commercial building energy codes (such as American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) 90.1 [@90.1]) have progressed with many control-related addenda. For example, from the publication of 90.1-2004 to 90.1-2016 (four code cycles), 30% of the new requirements are related to building control (with most of them focused on Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) system control) [@impl_ctrl]. | ||
|
|
||
| However, one of the challenges to realizing those savings is the correct implementation of such advanced control strategies and regularly verifying their actual operational performance. A field study found that only 50% of systems observed have their control system correctly configured to meet the energy codes requirement, and control-related compliance verification is typically not included in the commissioning scope. Current control verification is often conducted manually, which is time-consuming, ad-hoc, incomplete, and error-prone. |
docs/paper.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| # Statement of need | ||
|
|
||
| Advances in building control have shown significant potential for improving building energy performance and decarbonization. Studies show that designs utilizing optimized controls that are properly tuned could cut commercial building energy consumption by approximately 29% - equivalent to 4-5 Quads, or 4-5% of the energy consumed in the United States [@impa_ctrl]. Driven by the significant control-related energy-saving potential, commercial building energy codes (such as American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) 90.1 [@90.1]) have progressed with many control-related addenda. For example, from the publication of 90.1-2004 to 90.1-2016 (four code cycles), 30% of the new requirements are related to building control (with most of them focused on Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) system control) [@impl_ctrl]. |
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should probably use commercial building energy codes and standards instead of just commercial building energy codes.
lymereJ
commented
Aug 7, 2024
docs/paper.bib
Outdated
| @misc {bto_blueprint, | ||
| title={Decarbonizing the U.S. Economy by 2050: A National Blueprint for the Buildings Sector}, | ||
| author={{U.S. Department of Energy}}, | ||
| howpublished={\url{https://www.energy.gov/eere/articles/decarbonizing-us-economy-2050}} |
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing a , at the end :-)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The paper shows up in the artifact of the
draft-pdfGitHub action. Here's a example.