Skip to content

Add Chinese AI slop patterns - #17

Open
GodfatherPacino wants to merge 1 commit into
petergyang:mainfrom
GodfatherPacino:agent/chinese-ai-slop-patterns
Open

Add Chinese AI slop patterns#17
GodfatherPacino wants to merge 1 commit into
petergyang:mainfrom
GodfatherPacino:agent/chinese-ai-slop-patterns

Conversation

@GodfatherPacino

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Adds Chinese-language AI-slop coverage to the existing skill while keeping the same voice-preserving editing workflow.

What changed

  • Extends the skill description and workflow for Chinese drafts.
  • Adds Chinese-specific patterns for empty officialese, four-character phrase stacks, framework padding, fake specificity, inflated significance, vague attribution, translated-English Chinese, noun pileups, public-account hooks, and forced positivity.
  • Updates eval checks so Chinese edits preserve register while removing template phrasing.
  • Documents the new Chinese coverage in the README.

Validation

  • Ran a read-only source validation for required package files and SKILL.md frontmatter.
  • Ran git diff --check.

I did not run scripts/build_plugin.py --check because it creates and removes the dist directory; the source/package contract was checked without touching generated output.

@GodfatherPacino
GodfatherPacino marked this pull request as ready for review July 27, 2026 01:31
@iambot9

iambot9 commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

good one.

@cnhx

cnhx commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Would love to see this got merged.

@petergyang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Thanks for the substantial Chinese-language work. I want to keep the core skill compact before adding language-specific coverage. Could you rebase on current main, move the Chinese guidance into a dedicated skills/no-ai-slop/references/chinese.md file, and add a small set of native-language eval cases? That structure would make this easier to review and maintain.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants