-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
Refactor and extend History class #552
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
|
…regator returns scalars
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
…dev/optimagic into remote-history-arrays
The new plotly version (6.0.0) seems to have a bug. I had to restrict it. I could not find a MRE quickly. However, I already found out that the problem stems from these lines: # plotting_utilities.py[100-106]
if share_yrange_all:
lb = []
ub = []
for f in plots:
for d in f.data:
> lb.append(np.min(d["y"]))
> ub.append(np.max(d["y"])) The problem seems to be that |
HistoryArrays
class and add these methods toHistory
classtiming
module that contains functionality to createCostModels
(as described Improve runtime measures for criterion plot and benchmarking plots #547)History
class, most importantlyfun_data
andparams_data
, which return tidy data frames of the function evaluations and a user-selected time measure.Note
history_plots.py
), we must wait for Align plotting from logs and results #553fun_data
andparams_data
in the visualization code we will also wait for Align plotting from logs and results #553