Skip to content

Conversation

tosky
Copy link

@tosky tosky commented Dec 24, 2024

Add KUTTL and tempest zuul jobs (meant to replace the prow ones in the long term)

KUTTL: generate JUnitXML reports

  • switch the type to XML (the accepted value is 'xml' lowercase, not uppercase);
  • tune the name a bit to highlight it is a report;
  • add the new reportGranularity parameter which is supported by kuttl 0.20.0 and will restore the pre-1.17 JUnitXML format (granularity by test case, instead of by step);
  • remove the URL of kuttl, so that it is not tied to a specific release.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#2628

- switch the type to XML (the accepted value is 'xml' lowercase,
  not uppercase);
- tune the name a bit to highlight it is a report;
- add the new reportGranularity parameter which is supported
  by kuttl 0.20.0 and will restore the pre-1.17 JUnitXML format
  (granularity by test case, instead of by step);
- remove the URL of kuttl, so that it is not tied to a specific
  release.

Signed-off-by: Luigi Toscano <[email protected]>
They are meant to replace the prow ones in the long term.

Signed-off-by: Luigi Toscano <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 24, 2024

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 24, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tosky
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign dprince for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tosky
Copy link
Author

tosky commented Jan 7, 2025

recheck

@tosky tosky marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2025 23:47
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from abays and frenzyfriday January 7, 2025 23:48
@fmount fmount self-requested a review January 8, 2025 09:50
@tosky
Copy link
Author

tosky commented Feb 24, 2025

recheck

@cschwede
Copy link
Collaborator

/test all

Copy link

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/36199b234d564601ada878d358ea524b

openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider FAILURE in 14m 02s
⚠️ swift-operator-kuttl SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider (non-voting)
⚠️ swift-operator-tempest SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider (non-voting)

@tosky
Copy link
Author

tosky commented Jun 27, 2025

I would appreciate some help to understand why the swift-operator kuttl jobs require a few additional variables and why those are not passed around in the code I'm using to trigger the those test

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 18, 2025

@tosky: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/swift-operator-build-deploy-kuttl 86d7cb4 link true /test swift-operator-build-deploy-kuttl

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants