Skip to content

OSDOCS-15112:Update the z-stream RNs for 4.18.19 #95465

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 2, 2025

Conversation

tedaveryredhat
Copy link

@tedaveryredhat tedaveryredhat commented Jun 30, 2025

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jun 30, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 30, 2025

@tedaveryredhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-15112 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.18

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15112

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 30, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Jun 30, 2025

🤖 Wed Jul 02 14:00:58 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://95465--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-18-release-notes.html

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 30, 2025

@tedaveryredhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-15112 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.18

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15112

Link to docs preview:
https://95465--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-18-release-notes.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@tedaveryredhat
Copy link
Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 1, 2025

@tedaveryredhat: This pull request references OSDOCS-15112 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.18

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15112

Link to docs preview:
https://95465--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-18-release-notes.html

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Jul 1, 2025
@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR branch/enterprise-4.18 and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Jul 1, 2025
@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger self-assigned this Jul 1, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry two typos

@@ -3023,6 +3023,36 @@ This section will continue to be updated over time to provide notes on enhanceme
For any {product-title} release, always review the instructions on xref:../updating/updating_a_cluster/updating-cluster-web-console.adoc#updating-cluster-web-console[updating your cluster] properly.
====

// 4.18.19
[id="ocp-4-18-19_{context}"]
=== RHSA-2025:9725 - {product-title} {product-version}.18 bug fix and security update
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
=== RHSA-2025:9725 - {product-title} {product-version}.18 bug fix and security update
=== RHSA-2025:9725 - {product-title} {product-version}.19 bug fix and security update

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I just saw this typo


Issued: 2 July 2025

{product-title} release {product-version}.18 is now available. The list of bug fixes that are included in the update is documented in the link:https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9725[RHSA-2025:9725] advisory. The RPM packages that are included in the update are provided by the link:https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9726[RHSA-2025:9726] advisory.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
{product-title} release {product-version}.18 is now available. The list of bug fixes that are included in the update is documented in the link:https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9725[RHSA-2025:9725] advisory. The RPM packages that are included in the update are provided by the link:https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9726[RHSA-2025:9726] advisory.
{product-title} release {product-version}.19 is now available. The list of bug fixes that are included in the update is documented in the link:https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9725[RHSA-2025:9725] advisory. The RPM packages that are included in the update are provided by the link:https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9726[RHSA-2025:9726] advisory.

@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Jul 2, 2025

* Previously, the `oc adm node-image create` command incorrectly modified the existing permissions of the target assets folder when the command saved the artifacts on the disk. With this release, a bug fix ensures that the copying operation for the command keeps the destination folder permissions. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-57507[OCPBUGS-57507])

* Previously, Prometheus v3 did not support Alertmanager v1, which caused early failures when you specified `apiVersion v1` in config maps. With this release, the Alertmanager API Version is updated from v1 to v2 in the config maps to prevent `InvalidConfig` errors. As a result, the `InvalidConfig` errors do not occur when you upgrade to {product-title} version 4.19. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-56251[OCPBUGS-56251])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @tedaveryredhat 👋 my engineers let me know about the last minute change to this release note, they updated the Jira with what they consider correct now: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-56251

Do you want me to wait until this is merged and create a quick fix, or can this still be updated in this PR?
Thanks!

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This content can still be updated in this PR. I'm going to commit the new content this morning.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 2, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 2, 2025

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

Copy link
Contributor

@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

small nit


* Previously, the `oc adm node-image create` command incorrectly modified the existing permissions of the target assets folder when the command saved the artifacts on the disk. With this release, a bug fix ensures that the copying operation for the command keeps the destination folder permissions. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-57507[OCPBUGS-57507])

* Previously, using Alertmanager apiVersion v1 in the `openshift-monitoring/cluster-monitoring-config` or `openshift-user-workload-monitoring/user-workload-monitoring-config` parameters caused {product-title} 4.19 to fail early with an `InvalidConfigXXX` error. This issue occurred because {product-title} 4.19 is using Prometheus v3 which does not support Alertmanager apiVersion v1. With this release, {cmo-first} sets `upgradable=false` if apiVersion v1 is detected in the config maps to prevent the `InvalidConfigXXX` error from occurring after upgrading to {product-title} 4.19. As a result, clusters upgrade through {product-title} 4.18.x before moving to {product-title} 4.19. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-56251[OCPBUGS-56251])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* Previously, using Alertmanager apiVersion v1 in the `openshift-monitoring/cluster-monitoring-config` or `openshift-user-workload-monitoring/user-workload-monitoring-config` parameters caused {product-title} 4.19 to fail early with an `InvalidConfigXXX` error. This issue occurred because {product-title} 4.19 is using Prometheus v3 which does not support Alertmanager apiVersion v1. With this release, {cmo-first} sets `upgradable=false` if apiVersion v1 is detected in the config maps to prevent the `InvalidConfigXXX` error from occurring after upgrading to {product-title} 4.19. As a result, clusters upgrade through {product-title} 4.18.x before moving to {product-title} 4.19. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-56251[OCPBUGS-56251])
* Previously, using Alertmanager apiVersion v1 in the `openshift-monitoring/cluster-monitoring-config` or `openshift-user-workload-monitoring/user-workload-monitoring-config` parameters caused {product-title} 4.19 to fail early with an `InvalidConfigXXX` error. This issue occurred because {product-title} 4.19 is using Prometheus v3 which does not support Alertmanager apiVersion v1. With this release, {cmo-first} sets a value of `upgradable=false` if apiVersion v1 is detected in the config maps to prevent the `InvalidConfigXXX` error from occurring after upgrading to {product-title} 4.19. As a result, clusters upgrade through {product-title} 4.18.x before moving to {product-title} 4.19. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-56251[OCPBUGS-56251])

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 2, 2025

@tedaveryredhat: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@tedaveryredhat
Copy link
Author

/label merge-review-needed

@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger added the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Jul 2, 2025
@JoeAldinger JoeAldinger merged commit 0f835b3 into openshift:enterprise-4.18 Jul 2, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.18 jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants