Skip to content

Conversation

@rexagod
Copy link
Member

@rexagod rexagod commented Jul 2, 2025

  • I added CHANGELOG entry for this change.
  • No user facing changes, so no entry in CHANGELOG was needed.

TODO

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jul 2, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rexagod: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

  • I added CHANGELOG entry for this change.
  • No user facing changes, so no entry in CHANGELOG was needed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 2, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rexagod

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 2, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 2, 2025

@rexagod: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-hypershift-conformance 9723a72 link true /test e2e-hypershift-conformance
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview 9723a72 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node 9723a72 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node
ci/prow/generate 9723a72 link true /test generate

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@machine424
Copy link
Contributor

thanks! I think the generate target should be run (ci/prow/generate is failing)

@rexagod
Copy link
Member Author

rexagod commented Jul 9, 2025

Thanks, I think I'll push this to draft for now, just so we have the full list of required adjustments from the API team (once the KEP merges).

@rexagod rexagod marked this pull request as draft July 9, 2025 07:35
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 9, 2025
@rexagod rexagod changed the title NO-JIRA: Address Collection Profiles EP reviews MON-4284: Address Collection Profiles EP reviews Jul 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 9, 2025

@rexagod: This pull request references MON-4284 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

  • I added CHANGELOG entry for this change.
  • No user facing changes, so no entry in CHANGELOG was needed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 10, 2025

@rexagod: This pull request references MON-4284 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

  • I added CHANGELOG entry for this change.
  • No user facing changes, so no entry in CHANGELOG was needed.

TODO

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 10, 2025

@rexagod: This pull request references MON-4284 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

  • I added CHANGELOG entry for this change.
  • No user facing changes, so no entry in CHANGELOG was needed.

TODO

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@rexagod rexagod changed the title MON-4284: Address Collection Profiles EP reviews MON-4367: Address Collection Profiles EP reviews Sep 10, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 10, 2025

@rexagod: This pull request references MON-4367 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

  • I added CHANGELOG entry for this change.
  • No user facing changes, so no entry in CHANGELOG was needed.

TODO

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants