8278472: Invalid value set to CANDIDATEFORM structure

[kurashige23]

Hi all,

This is a backport of JDK-8278472: Invalid value set to CANDIDATEFORM structure

Except for the fix for Copyright year and the path change, original patch applies cleanly to 8u.
This resolves an issue where the candidate window does not appear when using an IME other than Microsoft IME.

Testing: jdk_desktop tests on Windows Server 2022 (some tests failed, but they failed before this fix was made)

Thanks.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• JDK-8278472 needs maintainer approval

Issue

• JDK-8278472: Invalid value set to CANDIDATEFORM structure (Bug - P3 - Requested)

Reviewers

• Paul Hohensee (@phohensee - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/648/head:pull/648
$ git checkout pull/648

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/648
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/648/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 648

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 648

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/648.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back kurashige23! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (bdae29de)

[openjdk]

⚠️ @kurashige23 This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

[kurashige23]

I think the GHA error is a certificate issue and not related to this PR.

/approval request Small and trivial fix, low risk. Except for the fix for Copyright year and the path change, original patch applies cleanly. jdk_desktop tests on Windows Server 2022 passed (some tests failed, but they failed before this fix was made)

[openjdk]

@kurashige23
8278472: The approval request has been created successfully.