Skip to content

8350462: MethodTypeForm.LF_INTERPRET can cache the MemberName instead #24468

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

linzihao1999
Copy link
Contributor

@linzihao1999 linzihao1999 commented Apr 5, 2025

Modify the cache in MethodTypeForm that currently stores the LF_INTERPRET Lambda form. Instead of caching the entire LambdaForm, change it to store a SoftReference. This will avoid unnecessary memory usage.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8350462: MethodTypeForm.LF_INTERPRET can cache the MemberName instead (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24468/head:pull/24468
$ git checkout pull/24468

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24468
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24468/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24468

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24468

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24468.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 5, 2025

👋 Welcome back linzihao1999! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 5, 2025

@linzihao1999 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8350462: MethodTypeForm.LF_INTERPRET can cache the MemberName instead

Reviewed-by: liach, jvernee

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 118 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@liach, @JornVernee) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 5, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 5, 2025

@linzihao1999 The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 5, 2025

Webrevs

@@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ final class MethodTypeForm {
// Cached lambda form information, for basic types only:
private final Object[] lambdaForms;

private SoftReference<MemberName> interpretEntry;

// Indexes into lambdaForms:
static final int
LF_INVVIRTUAL = 0, // DMH invokeVirtual
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can remove the LF_INTERPRET constant from this list.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, removed it.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now the index 6 is left unused in the LF cache array - we can leave it empty and renumber the cache indices when we add a new entry to cache.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it, thanks for the explanation.

@linzihao1999 linzihao1999 requested a review from liach April 6, 2025 12:55
@liach
Copy link
Member

liach commented Apr 7, 2025

I shall run hs-tier2 before approving, in case mainline leyden doesn't work with WeakReferences.

@liach
Copy link
Member

liach commented Apr 10, 2025

One unrelated client test failed in tier 1-3, everything else was fine.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 10, 2025
@linzihao1999
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Apr 10, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 10, 2025

@linzihao1999
Your change (at version 3ce154e) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

Copy link
Member

@JornVernee JornVernee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Nice simplification!

@liach
Copy link
Member

liach commented Apr 10, 2025

Thanks!

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 10, 2025

Going to push as commit dc249be.
Since your change was applied there have been 118 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Apr 10, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 10, 2025

@liach @linzihao1999 Pushed as commit dc249be.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants