Small perf: find() instead of filter() for retreat

[VariableVince]

Description:

Only need find() instead of filter() in orderRetreat and executeRetreat, since we just need the first hit. Small perf win.

Please complete the following:

• I have added screenshots for all UI updates
• I process any text displayed to the user through translateText() and I've added it to the en.json file
• I have added relevant tests to the test directory
• I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full responsibility for any bugs introduced

Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or regression is found:

tryout33

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Refactored array-based attack lookup in PlayerImpl by replacing filter(...)[0] with find(...) method, eliminating unnecessary array filtering and directly retrieving the target element. Updated corresponding null checks and method call syntax accordingly.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Attack Lookup Optimization src/core/game/PlayerImpl.ts	Replaced filter()[0] with find() for locating outgoing attacks by id. Updated null checks and adjusted method invocations to work with the direct element rather than array index.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Poem

🎯 A filter once searched through the list,
Now find() lands with a single twist,
No more [0] cluttering the way,
Cleaner code wins the day! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and accurately summarizes the main change: replacing filter() with find() for a performance improvement in the retreat functionality.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description is related to the changeset, explaining the performance rationale for using find() instead of filter() and confirming completion of testing and documentation requirements.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

src/core/game/PlayerImpl.ts (1)

369-369: Optional: rename the callback parameter to avoid shadowing the outer attack.

In both methods, the arrow-function parameter is named attack, which shadows the const attack being declared on the same line. It resolves correctly, but renaming it removes the visual confusion.

♻️ Suggested rename

-  const attack = this._outgoingAttacks.find((attack) => attack.id() === id);
+  const attack = this._outgoingAttacks.find((a) => a.id() === id);

Apply the same change on both line 369 and line 377.

Also applies to: 377-377

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@src/core/game/PlayerImpl.ts` at line 369, The local constant named attack is
being shadowed by the arrow-function parameter in the calls to
this._outgoingAttacks.find; update the callback parameter name (e.g., change
(attack) => to (outgoing) => or (atk) =>) in the find invocations so the outer
const attack refers to the found item without visual shadowing—apply the same
rename in both occurrences where this._outgoingAttacks.find is used (the lines
creating the const attack and the second similar find).

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Nitpick comments:
In `@src/core/game/PlayerImpl.ts`:
- Line 369: The local constant named attack is being shadowed by the
arrow-function parameter in the calls to this._outgoingAttacks.find; update the
callback parameter name (e.g., change (attack) => to (outgoing) => or (atk) =>)
in the find invocations so the outer const attack refers to the found item
without visual shadowing—apply the same rename in both occurrences where
this._outgoingAttacks.find is used (the lines creating the const attack and the
second similar find).