Fixing multiple models deploy

[YuliaKrimerman]

Closing issue 2 from https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-16540

Description

When selecting multiple models on a multi model server it was throwing and error when trying to deploy a second model. Found on kserve cluster.
Before

After

How Has This Been Tested?

2 Scenarios

1. Any cluster - In Data Science projects go to models, choose Multi-model serving platform. Add a model server.Deploy a model. Try to deploy a 2nd mode. Make sure that no error appears.
2. Cluster that has NIM enabled- we need to make sure that the InferenceService gets the right name when deploying a kserve model or a NIM model.

Test Impact

Fixed the failing test

Request review criteria:

Self checklist (all need to be checked):

• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has added tests or explained why testing cannot be added (unit or cypress tests for related changes)

If you have UI changes:

• Included any necessary screenshots or gifs if it was a UI change.
• Included tags to the UX team if it was a UI/UX change.

After the PR is posted & before it merges:

• The developer has tested their solution on a cluster by using the image produced by the PR to main

[mturley]

Quick fix for the test here

[mturley]

LGTM, tested on kserve-pm (modelmesh and kserve) and on ai-dev04.kni.syseng (borrowed from the NIM team) for the NIM form changes.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mturley

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• frontend/OWNERS [mturley]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[mturley]

FYI @jeff-phillips-18 , fixing some more InferenceService name stuff here that was caused by #3464. Sorry I overlooked these when talking through that PR with you.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.40%. Comparing base (70e0d4e) to head (fd0e462).
Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3561      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.56%   85.40%   -0.16%     
==========================================
  Files        1372     1378       +6     
  Lines       31211    31428     +217     
  Branches     8741     8797      +56     
==========================================
+ Hits        26705    26842     +137     
- Misses       4506     4586      +80     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
frontend/src/api/k8s/inferenceServices.ts	96.66% <100.00%> (ø)
...projects/NIMServiceModal/ManageNIMServingModal.tsx	87.21% <100.00%> (ø)
.../NIMServiceModal/NIMModelDeploymentNameSection.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 42 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 70e0d4e...fd0e462. Read the comment docs.