[RHOAIENG-1107] Storage Class Filter

[jpuzz0]

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-1107

Description

Added filter toolbar and pagination to the storage classes table page. Users can filter by display name and/or Openshift class name.

Demo:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6d86fe29-a3c8-46f1-badc-e459dce17123

(cc @xianli123)

How Has This Been Tested?

1. With the feature flag enabled, visit the storage class table's page; /storageClasses?devFeatureFlags=disableStorageClasses
2. Verify pagination exists
3. Verify the toolbar filter exists and matches the design
4. Verify you can filter by both display name and openshift class name
5. Verify empty state when filter yields no results and can reset filters via the action in that empty state ("Clear filters")

Test Impact

Added catch-all filter cypress test for storage classes

Request review criteria:

Self checklist (all need to be checked):

• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has added tests or explained why testing cannot be added (unit or cypress tests for related changes)

If you have UI changes:

• Included any necessary screenshots or gifs if it was a UI change.
• Included tags to the UX team if it was a UI/UX change.

After the PR is posted & before it merges:

• The developer has tested their solution on a cluster by using the image produced by the PR to main

[xianli123]

Thanks @jpuzz0 . Overall, it looks good to me.
One small change would be that the "S" of "OpenShift" in the placeholder should be a capital letter.

[jpuzz0]

Thanks @jpuzz0 . Overall, it looks good to me. One small change would be that the "S" of "OpenShift" in the placeholder should be a capital letter.

@xianli123 thanks for pointing this out! This is now corrected:

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 97.61905% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (main@83472f4). Learn more about missing BASE report.
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...nd/src/pages/storageClasses/StorageClassesPage.tsx	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3235   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   85.08%           
=======================================
  Files           ?     1292           
  Lines           ?    28814           
  Branches        ?     7749           
=======================================
  Hits            ?    24515           
  Misses          ?     4299           
  Partials        ?        0           

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...src/concepts/dashboard/DashboardEmptyTableView.tsx	100.00% <ø> (ø)
frontend/src/k8sTypes.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ratorProfiles/screens/list/AcceleratorProfiles.tsx	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...es/storageClasses/ResetCorruptConfigValueAlert.tsx	94.11% <100.00%> (ø)
...pages/storageClasses/StorageClassFilterToolbar.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...d/src/pages/storageClasses/StorageClassesTable.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...rc/pages/storageClasses/StorageClassesTableRow.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
frontend/src/pages/storageClasses/constants.ts	87.50% <100.00%> (ø)
...nd/src/pages/storageClasses/StorageClassesPage.tsx	61.90% <66.66%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 83472f4...37eb79f. Read the comment docs.

[DaoDaoNoCode]

Tested, works well
/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: DaoDaoNoCode, Gkrumbach07

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• frontend/OWNERS [Gkrumbach07]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[xianli123]

Thanks @jpuzz0. LGTM!