You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
adelton
changed the title
[BUG]: Creating the two PipelineRuns make one or both fail
[BUG]: Creating the two PipelineRuns makes one or both fail
Nov 21, 2023
@adelton The quick fix for this right now is to migrate your PipelineRun to use volumeClaimTemplate instead of a single pre-existing PVC for all Pipelines.
As we combine and refactor the pipelines (#177) to improve the workflow, we can add optional support for a collection of Pipelines to utilize a single PVC to archive data with support for purging older logs
@adelton The quick fix for this right now is to migrate your PipelineRun to use volumeClaimTemplate instead of a single pre-existing PVC for all Pipelines.
Could you do a PR so that we fix the repo content for everyone and folks don't need to do a one-off changes?
Details
Describe the bug
When the user just pastes
on a fresh namespace, there are high chances that
It's likely caused by a race condition over that new static
model_dir
part of the path introduced by #112 which the two pods are fighting for.To Reproduce
Paste the commands all in one and then check the PipelineRuns in console.
Alternatively, do
watch the first TaskRun (kserve-download-model) turn green in the console, then paste
and observe both the PipelineRuns in the console.
Expected behavior
Running the two PipelineRuns in parallel should still be possible the way it worked before, even if now one is git-based and the other one S3-based.
Screenshots (if applicable)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: