chore(deps): bump @tencent-weixin/openclaw-weixin from 2.4.6 to 2.4.9 in /plugins/openclaw-weixin - #318
Conversation
Bumps @tencent-weixin/openclaw-weixin from 2.4.6 to 2.4.9. --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: "@tencent-weixin/openclaw-weixin" dependency-version: 2.4.9 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-patch ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
|
🦞👀 Pull request received. I will update this pull request when review starts. ClawSweeper review completeClawSweeper finished reviewing this revision. The review result is being finalized. |
|
Codex review: blocked before merge. Reviewed September 21, 2026, 5:52 AM ET / 09:52 UTC (Revision 2). ClawSweeper reviewWhat this changesUpdates Crabpot’s Weixin compatibility fixture from 2.4.6 to 2.4.9, expands its dependency lockfile, and refreshes generated compatibility reports. Merge readiness⛔ Blocked before merge - 3 items remain The update remains useful and is not implemented on main. The earlier lockfile finding remains unresolved after the report refresh. Priority: P2 Review scores
Verification
How this fits togetherCrabpot checks plugin fixtures against a separately supplied OpenClaw host. Fixture package locks feed dependency audits, while compatibility checks produce reports and dashboard summaries. flowchart LR
A[Weixin package pin] --> B[Fixture dependency lock]
B --> C[Fixture security audit]
A --> D[Compatibility checks]
E[Workspace OpenClaw host] --> D
C --> F[CI result]
D --> G[Reports and dashboard]
Before merge
Findings
Agent review detailsSecurityNone. Review metrics
Merge-risk optionsMaintainer options:
Copy recommended automerge instructionTechnical reviewBest possible solution: Keep the 2.4.9 fixture update with a minimal plugin dependency lock, preserved security overrides, and compatibility reports validated against the workspace host. Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue? Yes, by source inspection: the branch adds 359 peer entries, and the checker audits the entire lock without excluding host peers. No audit or artifact-producing tests were executed during this read-only review. Is this the best way to solve the issue? The version bump is appropriate, but its lockfile generation is not: the documented legacy-peer-deps path preserves the existing host boundary without changing audit policy. Full review comments:
Overall correctness: patch is incorrect AGENTS.md: found and applied where relevant. Codex review notes: model internal, reasoning medium; reviewed against d43a6c9e875c. LabelsLabel justifications:
EvidenceAcceptance criteria:
What I checked:
Likely related people:
Rank-up movesOptional improvements that raise the rating; they are not merge blockers.
Rating scale
Overall follows the weaker of proof and patch quality. Workflow
HistoryReview history (1 earlier review cycle)
|
Bumps @tencent-weixin/openclaw-weixin from 2.4.6 to 2.4.9.
Maintainer changes
This version was pushed to npm by zengyi1001, a new releaser for
@tencent-weixin/openclaw-weixinsince your current version.Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditionswill show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)