chore(deps): bump plugins/clawrouter from e318761 to 788c547

[dependabot]

Bumps plugins/clawrouter from e318761 to 788c547.

Commits

• 788c547 v0.12.232 — fix: max_completion_tokens was never read, letting requests walk ...
• ca6ba77 v0.12.231 — sync Qwen3.7 Max (blockrun 07-20); bare qwen stays unbound
• 999d6aa feat(models): add Qwen3.7 Max
• f54d722 v0.12.230 — fix #213: tool-aware recovery of Kimi K3 nameless tool-call blobs
• a2515d6 fix: keep updater CLI in sync (#211)
• 8268cb5 v0.12.229 — sync Kimi K3 (blockrun 07-17 flagship); generic kimi stays on K2.7
• 76d6ad2 style: prettier pass on README + skill docs (unblocks CI format check)
• 2b5fb66 v0.12.228 — follow blockrun's 07-17 free re-probe; mirror the $0.002/tx fee
• 07a8a38 v0.12.227 — align picker + docs with the advertised catalog; fix dead image a...
• d3ff8ad v0.12.226 — salvage the two useful pieces of #206 (thanks @​0xCheetah1)
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

[clawsweeper]

Codex review: found issues before merge. Reviewed August 4, 2026, 2:14 AM ET / 06:14 UTC.

ClawSweeper review

What this changes

The PR advances the ClawRouter plugin fixture submodule from commit e318761 to 788c547.

Merge readiness

⛔ Blocked until real behavior proof is added - 8 items remain

Keep open: current main still pins ClawRouter at e318761, while this PR changes only the gitlink and leaves the committed reports pointing at that old revision. The July 27 request to Dependabot to close creates a maintainer-choice blocker: confirm retirement or complete the fixture refresh.

Priority: P2
Reviewed head: 46f732c9d13afd737f7ad32d3d9af84a2031ea7a
Owner decision: Required. See Decision needed.

Review scores

Measure	Result	What it means
Overall readiness	🧂 unranked krab (1/6)	The intended update is narrow, but its fixture contract and real behavior evidence are both incomplete.
Proof confidence	🧂 unranked krab (1/6)	Needs real behavior proof before merge: The PR contains no after-update run, report regeneration output, or other real behavior proof; add a redacted terminal transcript or artifact showing the refreshed fixture checks. After adding proof, update the PR body; ClawSweeper should re-review automatically. If it does not, the PR author or someone with repository write access can comment @clawsweeper re-review.
Patch quality	🦪 silver shellfish (2/6)	1 actionable review finding remain.

Verification

Check	Result	Evidence
Real behavior	Needs proof	Needs real behavior proof before merge: The PR contains no after-update run, report regeneration output, or other real behavior proof; add a redacted terminal transcript or artifact showing the refreshed fixture checks. After adding proof, update the PR body; ClawSweeper should re-review automatically. If it does not, the PR author or someone with repository write access can comment @clawsweeper re-review.
Evidence reviewed	5 items	PR changes only the source pointer: The proposed head changes the ClawRouter gitlink from e318761 to 788c547 and no report or expectation file. Committed report evidence is stale for the proposed revision: Both generated Markdown reports retain 112 links each to e318761, so merging this one-file update would make committed evidence disagree with the fixture revision. Repository fixture-update policy: The documented fixture update workflow runs tests and regenerates the compatibility report before inspecting and committing the resulting diff.
Findings	1 actionable finding	[P2] Refresh the complete ClawRouter fixture contract
Security	None	None.

How this fits together

Crabpot pins external plugins as git-submodule fixtures and inspects them into committed compatibility reports. The selected plugin revision feeds the inspector, whose reports and expectations are reviewed by CI.

flowchart LR
  A[ClawRouter source revision] --> B[Git submodule fixture]
  B --> C[Plugin inspector]
  C --> D[Generated compatibility reports]
  D --> E[Committed report contract]
  E --> F[CI and maintainer review]

Loading

Decision needed

Question	Recommendation
Should the July 27 request to close this PR retire the ClawRouter update, or should the update be completed with regenerated fixture artifacts?	Complete the fixture refresh: Keep the update only after committing regenerated reports and focused expectations for 788c547 with after-update proof.

Why: The explicit close request conflicts with the still-open PR’s useful but incomplete fixture update, and the bot cannot resolve that intent itself.

Before merge

• Refresh the complete ClawRouter fixture contract (P2) - The gitlink now selects 788c547, but the committed reports still link their ClawRouter evidence to e318761. Regenerate and commit the affected reports and focused expectations so CI and reviewers evaluate the same fixture revision.
• Resolve merge risk (P1) - Merging the one-line gitlink change without regenerated artifacts leaves the repository’s committed compatibility evidence tied to a different ClawRouter revision.
• Resolve merge risk (P1) - The upstream range changes provider and tool behavior, but no refreshed fixture output or after-update runtime evidence establishes the resulting contract.
• Complete next step (P2) - A human must resolve the explicit close request before any automated repair, and missing real behavior proof remains a contributor-side merge gate.
• Improve patch quality - Confirm whether the existing close request should retire the bump.
• Improve patch quality - If retaining it, commit regenerated report and focused expectation changes for 788c547.
• Improve patch quality - Attach redacted after-update validation output; a maintainer can request a fresh review if needed.

Findings

• [P2] Refresh the complete ClawRouter fixture contract — plugins/clawrouter:1

Agent review details

Security

None.

Review metrics

Metric	Value	Why it matters
Fixture/report alignment	1 gitlink changed; 2 generated Markdown reports unchanged	The proposed source revision would not match the committed human-review evidence.

Root-cause cluster

Relationship: canonical
Canonical: #240
Summary: This is the current highest-revision ClawRouter update; the earlier lower-revision update was closed unmerged.

Members:

• superseded: chore(deps): bump plugins/clawrouter from e318761 to f54d722 #233 - It proposed the same e318761 base with the older f54d722 target and was closed unmerged before this later revision was opened.

Proposal only: this assessment does not dispatch repair, suppress jobs, mutate sibling items, close, or merge anything.

Merge-risk options

Maintainer options:

1. Complete the fixture contract
   Regenerate and commit the ClawRouter report and expectation deltas, then provide redacted after-update validation before merging.
2. Retire the stale update
   Close this PR if the existing Dependabot close request was intended to decline this ClawRouter revision.

Technical review

Best possible solution:

Either explicitly retire this bump, or update the fixture through the documented workflow and commit every report and focused expectation delta produced for 788c547.

Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue?

Yes: the patch changes only the gitlink while the committed reports still contain e318761 evidence, a directly verifiable source mismatch.

Is this the best way to solve the issue?

No: a gitlink-only change is not the repository’s documented fixture-update path; regenerated report and expectation artifacts are needed unless maintainers choose to retire the bump.

Full review comments:

• [P2] Refresh the complete ClawRouter fixture contract — plugins/clawrouter:1
  The gitlink now selects 788c547, but the committed reports still link their ClawRouter evidence to e318761. Regenerate and commit the affected reports and focused expectations so CI and reviewers evaluate the same fixture revision.
  Confidence: 0.99

Overall correctness: patch is incorrect
Overall confidence: 0.99

AGENTS.md: found and applied where relevant.

Codex review notes: model internal, reasoning high; reviewed against 8ba54f94a9ee.

Labels

Label justifications:

• P2: This is a bounded fixture-contract inconsistency that can misstate compatibility evidence but does not break the core runtime.
• merge-risk: 🚨 compatibility: A newer external plugin revision can alter the captured provider, tool, command, and service contract without matching generated artifacts.
• rating: 🧂 unranked krab: Overall readiness is 🧂 unranked krab; proof is 🧂 unranked krab and patch quality is 🦪 silver shellfish.
• status: 📣 needs proof: The PR needs real behavior proof before ClawSweeper can clear the contributor ask. Needs real behavior proof before merge: The PR contains no after-update run, report regeneration output, or other real behavior proof; add a redacted terminal transcript or artifact showing the refreshed fixture checks. After adding proof, update the PR body; ClawSweeper should re-review automatically. If it does not, the PR author or someone with repository write access can comment @clawsweeper re-review.

Evidence

What I checked:

• PR changes only the source pointer: The proposed head changes the ClawRouter gitlink from e318761 to 788c547 and no report or expectation file. (plugins/clawrouter:1, 46f732c9d13a)
• Committed report evidence is stale for the proposed revision: Both generated Markdown reports retain 112 links each to e318761, so merging this one-file update would make committed evidence disagree with the fixture revision. (reports/crabpot-issues.md:1255, 8ba54f94a9ee)
• Repository fixture-update policy: The documented fixture update workflow runs tests and regenerates the compatibility report before inspecting and committing the resulting diff. (docs/operations.md:14, 8ba54f94a9ee)
• Current main and release do not contain this bump: Main still records e318761; the latest release v0.2.1 records the earlier 9706b01, and no tag contains this PR head. (plugins/clawrouter:1, 8ba54f94a9ee)
• Fixture-history ownership: The current ClawRouter pin was introduced by a prior Dependabot update; recent fixture-refresh and refresh-reliability work is associated with Peter Steinberger and Vincent Koc. (plugins/clawrouter:1, f08f0f510cd0)

Likely related people:

• Vincent Koc: Authored the recent fixture-refresh reliability fix and is the dominant contributor in the configuration/report history sampled. (role: recent fixture-refresh contributor; confidence: high; commits: 7d89a9f09475; files: crabpot.config.json, reports/crabpot-issues.md, reports/crabpot-report.md)
• steipete: Peter Steinberger authored recent fixture-refresh history and posted the existing request to close this PR. (role: recent fixture-refresh contributor; confidence: medium; commits: b92a5b604375; files: plugins/clawrouter, reports/crabpot-issues.md, reports/crabpot-report.md)
• dependabot[bot]: The prior merged submodule update introduced the e318761 revision that main and the reports currently describe. (role: introduced current ClawRouter pin; confidence: high; commits: f08f0f510cd0; files: plugins/clawrouter)

Rating scale

Score	Internal tier	Crab rank	Meaning
6/6	S	🦀 challenger crab	Exceptional readiness
5/6	A	🦞 diamond lobster	Very strong readiness
4/6	B	🐚 platinum hermit	Good normal PR; ordinary maintainer review
3/6	C	🦐 gold shrimp	Useful, but confidence is limited
2/6	D	🦪 silver shellfish	Proof or implementation needs work
1/6	F	🧂 unranked krab	Not merge-ready
N/A	NA	🌊 off-meta tidepool	Rating does not apply

Overall follows the weaker of proof and patch quality.
Shiny media proof means a screenshot, video, or linked artifact directly shows the changed behavior. Runtime, network, CSP, and security claims still need visible diagnostics.

Workflow

• ClawSweeper keeps one durable marker-backed review comment per issue or PR.
• Re-runs edit this comment so the latest verdict, findings, and automation markers stay together instead of adding duplicate bot comments.
• A fresh review can be triggered by eligible @clawsweeper re-review comments, exact-item GitHub events, scheduled/background review runs, or manual workflow dispatch.
• PR/issue authors and users with repository write access can comment @clawsweeper re-review or @clawsweeper re-run on an open PR or issue to request a fresh review only.
• Maintainers can also comment @clawsweeper review to request a fresh review only.
• Fresh-review commands do not start repair, autofix, rebase, CI repair, or automerge.
• Maintainer-only repair and merge flows require explicit commands such as @clawsweeper autofix, @clawsweeper automerge, @clawsweeper fix ci, or @clawsweeper address review.
• Maintainers can comment @clawsweeper explain to ask for more context, or @clawsweeper stop to stop active automation.

History

Review history (27 earlier review cycles; latest 8 shown)

• reviewed 2026-08-02T11:53:29.970Z sha 46f732c :: found issues before merge. :: [P2] Refresh the complete ClawRouter fixture contract
• reviewed 2026-08-02T15:26:00.448Z sha 46f732c :: found issues before merge. :: [P2] Refresh the complete ClawRouter fixture contract
• reviewed 2026-08-02T18:47:56.841Z sha 46f732c :: found issues before merge. :: [P2] Refresh the complete ClawRouter fixture contract
• reviewed 2026-08-02T21:04:30.988Z sha 46f732c :: needs changes before merge. :: [P2] Refresh the complete ClawRouter fixture contract
• reviewed 2026-08-03T05:26:45.928Z sha 46f732c :: found issues before merge. :: [P2] Refresh the complete ClawRouter fixture contract
• reviewed 2026-08-03T10:31:32.621Z sha 46f732c :: found issues before merge. :: [P2] Refresh the complete ClawRouter fixture contract
• reviewed 2026-08-03T16:48:36.301Z sha 46f732c :: found issues before merge. :: [P2] Refresh the complete ClawRouter fixture contract
• reviewed 2026-08-03T23:04:10.343Z sha 46f732c :: needs changes before merge. :: [P2] Refresh the complete ClawRouter fixture contract

[steipete]

@dependabot close

[dependabot]

Superseded by #281.