Handle empty EVMbench summaries - #161
Open
sylvesterkaczmarek wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
EVMbench.get_full_summary()handle an empty result setrun_group_idrather than indexing the first result taskNanoeval's base
Eval.self_test()explicitly callsget_full_summary([]). EVMbench currently builds a task list and then readstasks[0]solely to populate the run-group ID, which raisesIndexErrorwhen no results are available.The eval already owns the canonical
run_group_id, so the summary can use that value directly without depending on a completed task.Regression coverage verifies an empty summary reports zero samples and scores while retaining the eval run-group ID.