Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Implement the manifestwork ignoreFields #47

Merged

Conversation

mikeshng
Copy link
Member

@mikeshng mikeshng commented Mar 27, 2025

feat: Implement the manifestwork ignoreFields feature for application operation field to allow for manual sync and appset progressive sync to work properly

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 27, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mikeshng

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mikeshng mikeshng changed the title feat: Implement the manifestwork ignoreFields WIP - feat: Implement the manifestwork ignoreFields Mar 27, 2025
… operation field to allow for manual sync and appset progressive sync to work properly

Signed-off-by: Mike Ng <[email protected]>
@mikeshng mikeshng changed the title WIP - feat: Implement the manifestwork ignoreFields feat: Implement the manifestwork ignoreFields Apr 2, 2025
@mikeshng mikeshng requested a review from fxiang1 April 2, 2025 04:00
@mikeshng
Copy link
Member Author

mikeshng commented Apr 2, 2025

/assign @fxiang1

@fxiang1
Copy link

fxiang1 commented Apr 2, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Apr 2, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit ae472b8 into open-cluster-management-io:main Apr 2, 2025
5 checks passed
@fxiang1
Copy link

fxiang1 commented Apr 2, 2025

@mikeshng Everything looks good. If this is also going to downstream, you might want to check with the build team to see if they support Go 1.24. Thanks!

@mikeshng mikeshng deleted the ignorefields branch April 2, 2025 13:35
@mikeshng
Copy link
Member Author

mikeshng commented Apr 2, 2025

@mikeshng Everything looks good. If this is also going to downstream, you might want to check with the build team to see if they support Go 1.24. Thanks!

Thanks. This repo is upstream only.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants