Add missing hypotheses to mem_relint_dual and its sibling - #85
Merged
Conversation
Both relint duality lemmas were false as stated: * `mem_relint_iff_forall_dual_zero_le_mem_lineal_of_eq_zero` fails in infinite dimensions (for the lexicographic cone on `⊕ℕ R` the dual cone is trivial, making the right hand side vacuous while the relint is empty); it now assumes `C.FinRank`. Its forward direction holds unconditionally and is proven separately as `mem_lineal_dual_of_mem_relint`. * `mem_relint_dual` fails already in `R²` for non-dual-closed cones; it now assumes `C.DualClosed p` and `(dual p C).FinSalRank`. The `exists_dual_pos` example inherits the dual closedness assumption.
Contributor
Author
|
Before #82 one could give much easier disproofs for these |
YaelDillies
reviewed
Sep 2, 2026
YaelDillies
reviewed
Sep 3, 2026
Contributor
Author
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Both relint duality lemmas were false as stated:
mem_relint_iff_forall_dual_zero_le_mem_lineal_of_eq_zerofails in infinite dimensions (for the lexicographic cone on⊕ℕ Rthe dual cone is trivial, making the right hand side vacuous while the relint is empty); it now assumesC.FinRank. Its forward direction holds unconditionally and is proven separately asmem_lineal_dual_of_mem_relint.mem_relint_dualfails already inR²for non-dual-closed cones; it now assumesC.DualClosed pand(dual p C).FinSalRank. Theexists_dual_posexample inherits the dual closedness assumption.