Implemented the duplicate/delete web frame feature

[harjot20022001]

Description

Implemented the feature to duplicate and delete web frames on canvas.

Related Issues

None

Type of Change

• Bug fix
• New feature
• Documentation update
• Release
• Refactor
• Other (please describe):

Testing

None

Screenshots (if applicable)

None

Additional Notes

None

---

Important

Implemented web frame duplication feature in WindowManager class with unique ID generation and position adjustment.

• Feature:
  • Implemented web frame duplication in WindowManager class in index.ts.
  • duplicate() function creates a new WebFrame with a unique ID and adjusted position.
  • Logs duplication action with sendAnalytics.
• Imports:
  • Added nanoid for generating unique IDs.
  • Added WebFrame type for frame handling.

^{This description was created by for bd69c99. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[vercel]

@harjot20022001 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Onlook Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[ellipsis-dev]

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to bd69c99 in 1 minute and 37 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 84 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 3 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. apps/web/client/src/components/store/editor/window/index.ts:118

• Draft comment:
  Remove or replace console.log with a proper logging mechanism for production.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% Console.log statements in production code are generally considered bad practice as they clutter the console and may expose internal details. However, this seems like debug logging that could be helpful during development. The codebase already uses console.error for error cases, suggesting there isn't an established logging framework. Without knowing the logging standards of this codebase, this feels like a minor stylistic suggestion rather than a critical issue. I may be underestimating the importance of proper logging in production. Console.log statements could expose sensitive information or impact performance. While proper logging is important, this comment doesn't provide specific guidance on what logging mechanism to use, and without knowing the project's standards, removing debug logs could make development harder. The comment should be deleted as it's more of a general best practice suggestion rather than a specific, actionable issue with the changes. The debug logs aren't clearly problematic without more context about the project's logging standards.

2. apps/web/client/src/components/store/editor/window/index.ts:146

• Draft comment:
  Consider deep cloning windowMetadata if it is mutable to avoid shared state issues.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% While shared mutable state can be problematic, we don't have enough context to know if windowMetadata is mutable or if sharing its reference would cause issues. We can't see the WebFrame type definition or how windowMetadata is used elsewhere. The suggestion is speculative without strong evidence that this is actually a problem. The comment raises a valid software engineering concern about mutable shared state. Deep cloning objects is a common defensive programming practice. However, without clear evidence that windowMetadata is mutable or that sharing its reference would cause problems, this comment is speculative and may suggest unnecessary defensive code. Delete the comment as it makes a speculative suggestion without strong evidence that there's actually a problem with the current implementation.

3. apps/web/client/src/components/store/editor/window/index.ts:149

• Draft comment:
  If using MobX observable arrays, consider using .push(newFrame) instead of reassigning the array.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None

Workflow ID: wflow_6ulT8K39vUlDLA2s

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}