ci: Fix Docker options after removing oasis-deposit

[abukosek]

Note that I haven't found a way to pass the script arguments to the end of the Docker run command from GitHub Actions, but the nice part is that they don't really matter, since the test mnemonic and 5 accounts is already the default 🤷‍♂️

Closes #465.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for oasisprotocol-sapphire-paratime canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	9541ab6
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/oasisprotocol-sapphire-paratime/deploys/6762ae93b012a700081d8240

[matevz]

Can you pass the -to and -n inside the options: section? Or did you just hit actions/runner#1152 ?

[abukosek]

Can you pass the -to and -n inside the options: section? Or did you just hit actions/runner#1152 ?

Yeah, I tried both options and args and neither worked, because in both cases the options are treated as arguments to the docker run command instead of as arguments to the script inside the container :(

[matevz]

Can you pass the -to and -n inside the options: section? Or did you just hit actions/runner#1152 ?

Yeah, I tried both options and args and neither worked, because in both cases the options are treated as arguments to the docker run command instead of as arguments to the script inside the container :(

What about overriding --entrypoint '/start.sh -to 0x...' ?

[abukosek]

Can you pass the -to and -n inside the options: section? Or did you just hit actions/runner#1152 ?

Yeah, I tried both options and args and neither worked, because in both cases the options are treated as arguments to the docker run command instead of as arguments to the script inside the container :(

What about overriding --entrypoint '/start.sh -to 0x...' ?

That is super-hacky and harder to maintain. In the case of our CI, funding 2 accounts vs. 5 doesn't result in a noticeable speed improvement to warrant the extra maintenance burden IMO :)

[matevz]

That is super-hacky and harder to maintain. In the case of our CI, funding 2 accounts vs. 5 doesn't result in a noticeable speed improvement to warrant the extra maintenance burden IMO :)

It is for cases when a specific dApp CI tests require non-default accounts to be funded, or none at all.

[abukosek]

It is for cases when a specific dApp CI tests require non-default accounts to be funded, or none at all.

Yeah, in that case overriding the entrypoint is an option.