Skip to content

Conversation

@adiantum
Copy link
Contributor

Add thread safety to converged client

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 112 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 31.79%. Comparing base (762f6b8) to head (1c9fd25).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
converged/v4/anti_affinity_policies.go 0.00% 27 Missing ⚠️
converged/v4/vms.go 0.00% 25 Missing ⚠️
converged/v4/categories.go 0.00% 20 Missing ⚠️
converged/v4/utils.go 0.00% 14 Missing ⚠️
converged/v4/clusters.go 0.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
converged/v4/structs.go 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
converged/v4/tasks.go 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
converged/v4/images.go 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
converged/v4/storage_containers.go 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
converged/v4/subnets.go 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #291      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   32.11%   31.79%   -0.33%     
==========================================
  Files          33       33              
  Lines        4437     4482      +45     
==========================================
  Hits         1425     1425              
- Misses       2780     2825      +45     
  Partials      232      232              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@adiantum adiantum changed the title fix: Make sure that API call are thread safe [WIP] fix: Make sure that API call are thread safe Sep 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants