fix(learn): clarify intro to Node.js

[toocomputer]

Revise wording for clarity.

Description

Validation

Related Issues

Check List

• I have read the Contributing Guidelines and made commit messages that follow the guideline.
• I have run pnpm format to ensure the code follows the style guide. N/A
• I have run pnpm test to check if all tests are passing. N/A
• I have run pnpm build to check if the website builds without errors. N/A
• I've covered new added functionality with unit tests if necessary. N/A

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
nodejs-org	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Jul 21, 2025 10:21pm

[AugustinMauroy]

that's not better

[avivkeller]

Actually, I think that entire sentence is already a run-on. @toocomputer would you mind rephrasing the entire sentence into 2-3 sentences?

[toocomputer]

Not a run-on, @avivkeller, but not particularly clear either, at least not on first glance.

How's this (+ @AugustinMauroy)?

Node.js provides a set of asynchronous I/O primitives in its standard library that prevent JavaScript code from blocking. In addition, libraries in Node.js are generally written using non-blocking paradigms. Accordingly, blocking behavior is the exception rather than the norm in Node.js.

[avivkeller]

I like it!

[AugustinMauroy]

LGMT !

[toocomputer]

I wonder if you might consider giving more thoughtful and constructive feedback for PRs in the future, @AugustinMauroy.

As is stands, your initial comment comes off as brusque to the point of being rude; but more importantly, it's not helpful.

The sentence wasn't clear to me (initially), so I tried my hand (spending my own valuable time and energy) at making it better.

The way your comment reads discourages and disincentivizes people who are trying to help.

[AugustinMauroy]

no now it's good ! Your first proposed change was just a comma, so I was considering the potential relevance of the pr

[toocomputer]

Got it. It probably would've been helpful on my end as well to be more descriptive in terms of what I felt the issue was with the sentence and why it was unclear.

Anyway, thanks for reviewing 🖖🏼

[AugustinMauroy]

Got it. It probably would've been helpful on my end as well to be more descriptive in terms of what I felt the issue was with the sentence and why it was unclear.

Anyway, thanks for reviewing 🖖🏼

To be honest, there are more and more people who want to contribute with LLM, so when I see that we've changed just a comma, I'm always suspicious.

Because sometimes these people go so far as to respond to the review with ChatGPT or something else.

I hope I didn't upset you. And thank you for your contribution.

[github-actions]

Lighthouse Results

URL	Performance	Accessibility	Best Practices	SEO	Report
/en	🟢 98	🟢 100	🟢 100	🔴 66	🔗
/en/about	🟢 100	🟢 97	🟢 100	🔴 58	🔗
/en/about/previous-releases	🟢 98	🟢 93	🟢 100	🔴 61	🔗
/en/download	🟢 93	🟢 100	🟢 100	🔴 66	🔗
/en/blog	🟢 100	🟢 100	🟢 96	🔴 69	🔗

[toocomputer]

thanks for clarifying @AugustinMauroy. the feedback definitely rubbed me the rub wrong way, but i totally get your point about having to be wary.

it's a shame how some people have ruined it for folks who are genuinely trying to be helpful.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.97%. Comparing base (0122397) to head (211571a).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8004   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.97%   72.97%           
=======================================
  Files          95       95           
  Lines        8308     8308           
  Branches      214      214           
=======================================
  Hits         6063     6063           
  Misses       2244     2244           
  Partials        1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.