Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Create codeql-analysis.yml #4405

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dustincrogers
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 Thanks for submitting a pull request! 🎉

Summary

Adding routine codeacanning workflow.

Fixes #<replace_with_issue_number>


For us to review and ship your PR efficiently, please perform the following steps:

  • Open a bug/issue before writing your code 🧑‍💻. This ensures we can discuss the changes and get feedback from everyone that should be involved. If you`re fixing a typo or something that`s on fire 🔥 (e.g. incident related), you can skip this step.
  • Read the contribution guidelines 📖. This ensures your code follows our style guide and
    passes our tests.
  • Update or add tests (if any source code was changed or added) 🧪
  • Update or add documentation (if features were changed or added) 📝
  • Make sure the status checks below are successful ✅

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory, but encouraged)

@dustincrogers dustincrogers added the type: security code to address security issues label Aug 2, 2022
@dustincrogers dustincrogers changed the title Create codeql-analysis.yml chore: Create codeql-analysis.yml Aug 2, 2022
@conventional-commit-lint-gcf
Copy link

conventional-commit-lint-gcf bot commented Aug 2, 2022

🤖 I detect that the PR title and the commit message differ and there's only one commit. To use the PR title for the commit history, you can use Github's automerge feature with squashing, or use automerge label. Good luck human!

-- conventional-commit-lint bot
https://conventionalcommits.org/

@github-actions github-actions bot added the type: chore work needed to keep the product and development running smoothly label Aug 2, 2022
@AndyTurnerNetlify
Copy link

@dustincrogers - any update here?

Copy link
Contributor

@lukasholzer lukasholzer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wouldn't it make sense to add it as a step of our build pipeline? otherwise we have to build everything twice?

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale label Jul 28, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Sep 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Owner: AppSec security-risk: low stale type: chore work needed to keep the product and development running smoothly type: security code to address security issues
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants