-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue 67 (Sourcery refactored) #130
Conversation
Sourcery Code Quality Report✅ Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.29%.
Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:
Legend and ExplanationThe emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:
The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request. Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated. We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come! Help us improve this quality report! |
e73184f
to
79b1856
Compare
79b1856
to
cfbca6a
Compare
error_message = {} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Function AccessListSerializer.validate
refactored with the following changes:
- Move assignment closer to its usage within a block (
move-assign-in-block
) - Use named expression to simplify assignment and conditional (
use-named-expression
)
response = self.client.get("{}?format=api".format(url), **self.header) | ||
response = self.client.get(f"{url}?format=api", **self.header) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Function AppTest.test_root
refactored with the following changes:
- Replace call to format with f-string (
use-fstring-for-formatting
)
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! 0 Bugs No Coverage information |
Pull Request #122 refactored by Sourcery.
If you're happy with these changes, merge this Pull Request using the Squash and merge strategy.
NOTE: As code is pushed to the original Pull Request, Sourcery will
re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with new refactorings as
necessary. If Sourcery finds no refactorings at any point, this Pull Request
will be closed automatically.
See our documentation here.
Run Sourcery locally
Reduce the feedback loop during development by using the Sourcery editor plugin:
Review changes via command line
To manually merge these changes, make sure you're on the
issue_67
branch, then run:Help us improve this pull request!