Skip to content

Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY]#127

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability
Open

Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY]#127
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@renovate renovate Bot commented Aug 6, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
jsonwebtoken ^8.5.1^9.0.0 age confidence

jsonwebtoken's insecure implementation of key retrieval function could lead to Forgeable Public/Private Tokens from RSA to HMAC

CVE-2022-23541 / GHSA-hjrf-2m68-5959

More information

Details

Overview

Versions <=8.5.1 of jsonwebtoken library can be misconfigured so that passing a poorly implemented key retrieval function (referring to the secretOrPublicKey argument from the readme link) will result in incorrect verification of tokens. There is a possibility of using a different algorithm and key combination in verification than the one that was used to sign the tokens. Specifically, tokens signed with an asymmetric public key could be verified with a symmetric HS256 algorithm. This can lead to successful validation of forged tokens.

Am I affected?

You will be affected if your application is supporting usage of both symmetric key and asymmetric key in jwt.verify() implementation with the same key retrieval function.

How do I fix it?

Update to version 9.0.0.

Will the fix impact my users?

There is no impact for end users

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 5.0 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


jsonwebtoken unrestricted key type could lead to legacy keys usage

CVE-2022-23539 / GHSA-8cf7-32gw-wr33

More information

Details

Overview

Versions <=8.5.1 of jsonwebtoken library could be misconfigured so that legacy, insecure key types are used for signature verification. For example, DSA keys could be used with the RS256 algorithm.

Am I affected?

You are affected if you are using an algorithm and a key type other than the combinations mentioned below

Key type algorithm
ec ES256, ES384, ES512
rsa RS256, RS384, RS512, PS256, PS384, PS512
rsa-pss PS256, PS384, PS512

And for Elliptic Curve algorithms:

alg Curve
ES256 prime256v1
ES384 secp384r1
ES512 secp521r1
How do I fix it?

Update to version 9.0.0. This version validates for asymmetric key type and algorithm combinations. Please refer to the above mentioned algorithm / key type combinations for the valid secure configuration. After updating to version 9.0.0, If you still intend to continue with signing or verifying tokens using invalid key type/algorithm value combinations, you’ll need to set the allowInvalidAsymmetricKeyTypes option to true in the sign() and/or verify() functions.

Will the fix impact my users?

There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you already use a valid secure combination of key type and algorithm. Otherwise, use the allowInvalidAsymmetricKeyTypes option to true in the sign() and verify() functions to continue usage of invalid key type/algorithm combination in 9.0.0 for legacy compatibility.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 8.1 / 10 (High)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


jsonwebtoken vulnerable to signature validation bypass due to insecure default algorithm in jwt.verify()

CVE-2022-23540 / GHSA-qwph-4952-7xr6

More information

Details

Overview

In versions <=8.5.1 of jsonwebtoken library, lack of algorithm definition and a falsy secret or key in the jwt.verify() function can lead to signature validation bypass due to defaulting to the none algorithm for signature verification.

Am I affected?

You will be affected if all the following are true in the jwt.verify() function:

  • a token with no signature is received
  • no algorithms are specified
  • a falsy (e.g. null, false, undefined) secret or key is passed
How do I fix it?

Update to version 9.0.0 which removes the default support for the none algorithm in the jwt.verify() method.

Will the fix impact my users?

There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you don’t need to allow for the none algorithm. If you need 'none' algorithm, you have to explicitly specify that in jwt.verify() options.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 6.4 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Release Notes

auth0/node-jsonwebtoken (jsonwebtoken)

v9.0.0

Compare Source

Breaking changes: See Migration from v8 to v9

Breaking changes
  • Removed support for Node versions 11 and below.
  • The verify() function no longer accepts unsigned tokens by default. ([8345030]8345030)
  • RSA key size must be 2048 bits or greater. ([ecdf6cc]ecdf6cc)
  • Key types must be valid for the signing / verification algorithm
Security fixes
  • security: fixes Arbitrary File Write via verify function - CVE-2022-23529
  • security: fixes Insecure default algorithm in jwt.verify() could lead to signature validation bypass - CVE-2022-23540
  • security: fixes Insecure implementation of key retrieval function could lead to Forgeable Public/Private Tokens from RSA to HMAC - CVE-2022-23541
  • security: fixes Unrestricted key type could lead to legacy keys usage - CVE-2022-23539

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • ""
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from 11e6d36 to 0a2da0a Compare August 10, 2025 14:12
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from 0a2da0a to 34d665e Compare August 19, 2025 19:16
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from 34d665e to fb2d034 Compare September 25, 2025 19:35
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from fb2d034 to dbde385 Compare October 21, 2025 09:12
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from dbde385 to a0711e8 Compare November 11, 2025 02:15
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from a0711e8 to 25ffb42 Compare November 18, 2025 22:36
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from 25ffb42 to ed7130a Compare December 3, 2025 17:00
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from ed7130a to c33b574 Compare December 31, 2025 15:15
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from c33b574 to b4a0ab6 Compare January 19, 2026 18:08
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from b4a0ab6 to f8b18c1 Compare February 2, 2026 19:34
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from ced662f to 989cb32 Compare February 17, 2026 21:04
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from 989cb32 to d4751eb Compare March 5, 2026 18:05
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [security] fix(deps): update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [security] - autoclosed Mar 27, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot closed this Mar 27, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot deleted the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch March 27, 2026 05:44
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [security] - autoclosed fix(deps): update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [security] Mar 30, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot reopened this Mar 30, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from d4751eb to 0ca8d14 Compare March 30, 2026 18:12
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [security] Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY] Apr 8, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from 0ca8d14 to a44a6df Compare April 8, 2026 14:57
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY] Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY] - autoclosed Apr 27, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot closed this Apr 27, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY] - autoclosed Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY] Apr 27, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot reopened this Apr 27, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from a44a6df to f4e3e7f Compare April 27, 2026 23:17
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 0974597 to 60280a5 Compare May 18, 2026 14:35
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from 60280a5 to fc5d9f1 Compare May 28, 2026 16:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants