Skip to content

[ci] E: Update Nanvix SDK#125

Merged
ppenna merged 1 commit into
nanvix/v2.12.9from
automation/update-nanvix-version
Jul 15, 2026
Merged

[ci] E: Update Nanvix SDK#125
ppenna merged 1 commit into
nanvix/v2.12.9from
automation/update-nanvix-version

Conversation

@ppenna

@ppenna ppenna commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Automated coherent update to verified Nanvix SDK v0.20.2-sdk.1. The manifest and lockfile were generated atomically by the target zutils implementation.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 15, 2026 11:27

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the repository’s Nanvix build metadata to use the newer verified Nanvix SDK release, keeping the manifest and lockfile in sync for reproducible builds.

Changes:

  • Bumped nanvix-version from 0.20.0 to 0.20.2 in the Nanvix manifest.
  • Updated the toolchain sdk-version to v0.20.2-sdk.1 and refreshed the corresponding image digest.
  • Regenerated the Nanvix lockfile metadata (manifest hash, zutil version, SDK/sysroot/toolchain pins, and dependency asset references) to match the new SDK.
Show a summary per file
File Description
.nanvix/nanvix.toml Updates Nanvix and SDK version pins (plus image digest) used by the build.
.nanvix/nanvix.lock Regenerates the lockfile to reflect the new SDK/sysroot/toolchain and dependency asset references.

Review details

Tip

Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

  • Files reviewed: 1/2 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0
  • Review effort level: Low

@ppenna
ppenna merged commit 4ad198b into nanvix/v2.12.9 Jul 15, 2026
13 checks passed
@ppenna
ppenna deleted the automation/update-nanvix-version branch July 15, 2026 11:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants