Allow pull request for clang-format changes #1
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Remove repo lockdown on clang-format specific directories
mydeveloperday
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 9, 2023
TSan reports the following data race:
Write of size 4 at 0x000109e0b160 by thread T2 (mutexes: write M0, write M1):
#0 NativeFile::Close() File.cpp:329
#1 ConnectionFileDescriptor::Disconnect(lldb_private::Status*) ConnectionFileDescriptorPosix.cpp:232
llvm#2 Communication::Disconnect(lldb_private::Status*) Communication.cpp:61
llvm#3 process_gdb_remote::ProcessGDBRemote::DidExit() ProcessGDBRemote.cpp:1164
llvm#4 Process::SetExitStatus(int, char const*) Process.cpp:1097
llvm#5 process_gdb_remote::ProcessGDBRemote::MonitorDebugserverProcess(...) ProcessGDBRemote.cpp:3387
Previous read of size 4 at 0x000109e0b160 by main thread (mutexes: write M2):
#0 NativeFile::IsValid() const File.h:393
#1 ConnectionFileDescriptor::IsConnected() const ConnectionFileDescriptorPosix.cpp:121
llvm#2 Communication::IsConnected() const Communication.cpp:79
llvm#3 process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunication::WaitForPacketNoLock(...) GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp:256
llvm#4 process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunication::WaitForPacketNoLock(...l) GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp:244
llvm#5 process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteClientBase::SendPacketAndWaitForResponseNoLock(llvm::StringRef, StringExtractorGDBRemote&) GDBRemoteClientBase.cpp:246
The problem is that in WaitForPacketNoLock's run loop, it checks that
the connection is still connected. This races with the
ConnectionFileDescriptor disconnecting. Most (but not all) access to the
IOObject in ConnectionFileDescriptorPosix is already gated by the mutex.
This patch just protects IsConnected in the same way.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157347
mydeveloperday
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2024
…ass template explict specializations (llvm#78720) According to [[dcl.type.elab] p2](http://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.type.elab#2): > If an [elaborated-type-specifier](http://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.type.elab#nt:elaborated-type-specifier) is the sole constituent of a declaration, the declaration is ill-formed unless it is an explicit specialization, an explicit instantiation or it has one of the following forms [...] Consider the following: ```cpp template<typename T> struct A { template<typename U> struct B; }; template<> template<typename U> struct A<int>::B; // #1 ``` The _elaborated-type-specifier_ at `#1` declares an explicit specialization (which is itself a template). We currently (incorrectly) reject this, and this PR fixes that. I moved the point at which _elaborated-type-specifiers_ with _nested-name-specifiers_ are diagnosed from `ParsedFreeStandingDeclSpec` to `ActOnTag` for two reasons: `ActOnTag` isn't called for explicit instantiations and partial/explicit specializations, and because it's where we determine if a member specialization is being declared. With respect to diagnostics, I am currently issuing the diagnostic without marking the declaration as invalid or returning early, which results in more diagnostics that I think is necessary. I would like feedback regarding what the "correct" behavior should be here.
mydeveloperday
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2024
Builder alerted me to the failing test, attempt #1 in the blind.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Remove repo lockdown on clang-format specific directories