[core] Remove issue emoji

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/2.feature.yml

@@ -24,13 +24,13 @@ body:
           required: true
   - type: textarea
     attributes:
-      label: Summary 💡
+      label: Summary
       description: Describe how it should work.
   - type: textarea
     attributes:
-      label: Examples 🌈
+      label: Examples
       description: Provide a link for appropriate benchmarks, such as Material Design or other design system's implementations, and screenshots/videos of the expected behavior.
   - type: textarea
     attributes:
-      label: Motivation 🔦
+      label: Motivation
       description: What are you trying to accomplish? How has the lack of this feature affected you? Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is more useful in the real world.

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/3.support.yml

@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ body:
           required: true
   - type: textarea
     attributes:
-      label: The problem in depth 🔍
+      label: The problem in depth
   - type: textarea
     attributes:
-      label: Your environment 🌎
+      label: Your environment
       description: The version of the design file you are using. The version is usually disabled in the footer of the design frames.

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/4.rfc.yml

@@ -11,15 +11,15 @@ body:
         Thanks for contributing by creating an RFC! ❤️
   - type: textarea
     attributes:
-      label: What's the problem? 🤔
+      label: What's the problem?
       description: A short paragraph or bullet list that quickly explains what you're trying to do, what value do we expect to get or any other relevant information to understand motivation behind this RFC.
   - type: textarea
     attributes:
-      label: What are the requirements? ❓
+      label: What are the requirements?
       description: Provide a list of requirements that should be met by the accepted proposal.
   - type: textarea
     attributes:
-      label: What are our options? 💡
+      label: What are our options?
       description: |
         Have you considered all options that we can achieve same/similar thing? It doesn't have to be explored in same detail as the main proposal, but having alternative options that you can present can help strengthen main proposal.
 
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ body:
         - linking to project briefs or wireframes that are relevant
   - type: textarea
     attributes:
-      label: Proposed solution 🟢
+      label: Proposed solution
       description: |
         This is the core of RFC, and its purpose is to clearly explain reasoning for the proposed solution, why it's better compared to the other options or why should it be chosen instead.