Skip to content

Conversation

@camd
Copy link
Collaborator

@camd camd commented Dec 2, 2025

This updates the counts in both Push Health, and the status lines in Treeherder for a push.

@camd camd self-assigned this Dec 2, 2025
@camd camd requested a review from jmaher December 2, 2025 18:58
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 2, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 34.28571% with 23 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 79.93%. Comparing base (5d64caf) to head (fa17564).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
ui/push-health/ClassificationGroup.jsx 27.27% 8 Missing ⚠️
ui/push-health/Test.jsx 20.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
ui/push-health/PlatformConfig.jsx 20.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
treeherder/webapp/api/push.py 33.33% 2 Missing ⚠️
ui/push-health/Health.jsx 80.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9104      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   79.95%   79.93%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         600      600              
  Lines       32560    32575      +15     
  Branches     3310     3361      +51     
==========================================
+ Hits        26032    26038       +6     
- Misses       6362     6371       +9     
  Partials      166      166              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@camd camd force-pushed the camd/push-health-confirm-failure branch from eefe817 to fa17564 Compare December 6, 2025 16:49
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)


def count_unique_test_failures(failures):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is correct. But since it is a utility function that is used at 3 places now (and may get used further), I think it would be nice to have a small unit test for it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants