Intermittent failures filter

[djangoliv]

No description provided.

[jmaher]

testing this locally, I enjoyed seeing the option for selecting multiple items, this worked well.

the problem I had was after selecting a few items, I ended up wanting to remove some and it was hard to see what was set and not as it didn't expand visually.

I would like to get this working for components also.

[djangoliv]

@jmaher I added the filter to 'component' and expanded the viewing area to make deletion easier.

[jmaher]

thanks for adding it to the components. There is still an issue with the editing:

[djangoliv]

thanks for adding it to the components. There is still an issue with the editing:

@jmaher fixed. Can you try again please ?

[jmaher]

this is looking a lot better. I like that the drop down pops up a clean looking list with checkboxes, and when clicking it, you can see what is checked.

The items that are shown are basically a single letter and a X, due to the lack of pixels. I found opening the list and checking/unchecking was most effective.

This brings up a decision to make:

1. show the full name of checked items?
2. don't show any names, just an indicator something is checked and only use the popup list

I think a user would expect #1, but #2 seems more useful. If #1 isn't possible to do, then I am fine with #2. This doesn't need to be perfect, just not confusing.

[djangoliv]

this is looking a lot better. I like that the drop down pops up a clean looking list with checkboxes, and when clicking it, you can see what is checked.

The items that are shown are basically a single letter and a X, due to the lack of pixels. I found opening the list and checking/unchecking was most effective.

This brings up a decision to make:

1. show the full name of checked items?

2. don't show any names, just an indicator something is checked and only use the popup list

I think a user would expect #1, but #2 seems more useful. If #1 isn't possible to do, then I am fine with #2. This doesn't need to be perfect, just not confusing.

I think solution #1 is not possible. So I opted for solution #2.